Laserfiche WebLink
IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2018-087 <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />AFFIRMING THE CITY'S CONTINUED COOPERATION WITH THE PUBLIC SECTOR <br />UNIONS IN THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO TO ENSURE THEIR HEALTH AND <br />SUCCESS; AND SUPPORTING THE FREEDOM OF CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />EMPLOYEES TO COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN AFTER A UNITED STATES SUPREME <br />COURT DECISION IN JANUS V. AFSCME <br />WHEREAS, all families should have the means to thrive in safe and healthy communities; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the working people who make San Leandro run deserve good jobs that can <br />support families; and <br />WHEREAS, over the last forty years, working people have become more productive than <br />ever, yet real wages have declined and Chief Executive Officers make more than ever before; i.e., 347 <br />times more than the average person in 2016; and <br />WHEREAS, being able to work together in unions gives people - particularly women and <br />people of color - a powerful voice in speaking up for themselves, their families, and their communities <br />and ensures they are treated with dignity and respect at work; and <br />WHEREAS, when people stick together in unions, they leverage power in numbers to raise <br />wages and improve benefits like health care for themselves, their families, and communities; and <br />WHEREAS, people working collectively together in unions have won victories like the 40 - <br />hour work week, overtime pay, and health and safety standards, as well as advanced policies <br />especially important to women like paid leave, earned sick time, and reducing the gender pay gap; and <br />WHEREAS, when people can negotiate together for strong contracts, higher wages, and <br />safer, dignified working conditions, all of society benefits, communities become stronger, and the <br />entire economy is made fairer; and <br />WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court is considering the case Janus v. AFSCME <br />Council 31, which could restrict unions from requiring dues from non-member employees who <br />benefit from collective bargaining, thereby weakening the unions' power to effectively negotiate on <br />behalf of all public sector workers - such as teachers, police officers, and firefighters; and <br />WHEREAS, an unfavorable decision by the United States Supreme Court in Janus v. <br />AFSCME may deny public sector workers the freedom to access strong unions that make our <br />communities safe, more equitable, and strong; and <br />WHEREAS, in states where public union rights have come under attack, there have been <br />different outcomes - in Wisconsin, for example, union membership has fallen 38% after the state <br />passed a law in 2011 curtailing collective bargaining, but in other states such as Ohio and New <br />Hampshire, unions have been able to survive similar attacks through proactive strategies; and <br />