My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8I Consent Calendar 2018 0917
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
Packet 2018 0917
>
8I Consent Calendar 2018 0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 4:28:41 PM
Creation date
9/11/2018 4:28:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
9/17/2018
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2018-115
(Message)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />Annual Rent Review Program Evaluation Report (July 2016 – June 2017) <br /> <br />Rent Review Board Hearings <br />From July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, City staff addressed 186 tenant and 26 landlord <br />inquiries for a total of 212 inquiries relating to the City's policies on rent increases and the Rent Review Program. Of all 212 inquiries (from either tenants or landlords), 26% were related to rent <br />increases. <br /> <br />During this reporting period there were 41 renters who applied for Rent Review Board (RRB) <br />hearing. Of these 41 hearing requests, the following is the breakdown of the outcome of those requests (see attached “Monthly Status Report of Rent Review Activities” for case details): <br /> <br />• 16 (or 39%) cases were ineligible for a rent review hearing; Of those cases, following is <br />how they were ineligible: o 11 (or 27% of total cases) were not subject to the RRO (3 properties located outside of City Limits, 6 were Mobile Homes not subject to the ordinance, and 2 <br />were at a regulated affordable housing development); <br />o 2 (or 5% of total cases) cases were ineligible due to the landlord not following <br />ordinance requirements; o 3 (or 7% of total cases) cases were ineligible due to the tenant not following ordinance requirements; <br />• 11 (or 27%) cases did not have a hearing scheduled; Of those cases, following is why they <br />were not heard: o 5 (or 12% of total cases) Landlords were instructed to re-issue the rent increase with Rent Review Ordinance required notice; <br />o 6 (or 15% of total cases) were resolved without a Rent Review Hearing; <br />• 14 (or 34%) of FY 16-17 cases were scheduled for a hearing; o 5 (or 12% of total cases) were resolved prior to the scheduled hearing; o 8 (20% of total cases) were resolved at the hearing; <br />o 1 (or 3% of total cases) were resolved prior to the 2nd scheduled hearing. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Note that in prior Rent Review Program Evaluation Reports there was an analysis of asking rents <br />in in the San Leandro market. This analysis was based on data from RealFacts, a company that <br />compiled rental market data. Since the last evaluation report was published, this company is no <br />longer in operation. Given Housing Division staff transition in FY 16-17, there was no staff available to collect other rental market data for this period.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.