Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 127 <br />network, the City’s customers are service providers rather than retail customers, allowing <br />San Leandro to maintain transparency and avoid any direct “customer service” issues <br />with customers using the network. <br /> <br />The City should identify prime target commercial buildings that could be connected to the <br />fiber network. Commercial buildings with a direct fiber connection to a major data center <br />facility could be quite attractive for companies looking to locate within the City of San <br />Leandro. These buildings would be considered “on-net,” meaning they are serviced by <br />City fiber and have a connection to a major computing center or an internet point-of- <br />presence (POP). <br /> <br />While taking on this form of endeavor may seem daunting, it is being done daily by <br />municipalities and new competitive service providers. These additional services could <br />have a major impact to the community, while building next-generation foundational <br />community owned infrastructure. <br /> <br />In addition, this platform would be utilized to connect City facilities and sites, utility <br />components, sensor networks, 5G and small cell deployments, while functioning as the <br />infrastructure of San Leandro’s digital eco-system and powering Smart City initiatives. <br /> <br />The City would contract for capacity or bandwidth from a provider that could interconnect <br />the San Leandro network to a regional data center or colocation facility. Many providers <br />in San Leandro have dark fiber and provide dark or lit transport services. <br /> <br />The City's network would have the ability to provide access to businesses located within <br />the fiber network's footprint. While the City wouldn’t service these businesses directly, <br />there may be opportunities to align with a retail business provider to deliver the required <br />services. San Leandro should identify multi-unit commercial buildings to connect to the <br />network, as these buildings will normally include many potential users, but will require a <br />single premise drop. These opportunities should reduce the overall cost to connect <br />business users, lowering the average capital cost of each connection. <br /> <br />Under a wholesale lit transport business model, San Leandro would identify the potential <br />market for both business and community anchor connections, as well as connections and <br />pole attachments for the light poles. Through buffer analysis, San Leandro can target <br />businesses and light poles at specific distance from the fiber-optic network – this becomes <br />the potential market for the City. San Leandro would likely not be able to make the <br />business case to run a fiber lateral one mile to a business – however, 500ft could be a <br />manageable build. In some cases, the City may ask potential users to contribute capital <br />toward the fiber buildout. In Santa Monica, the City required “capital contribution” for <br />business transport connections, which served as a way to reduce the overall capital <br />burden on the City. While this practice is advisable, San Leandro will encounter local <br />businesses that simply cannot afford this. Capital contributions can become an obstacle <br />to gaining market share; however, the City has the ability to set these policies as it <br />develops its rate schedule in the future. <br />