Laserfiche WebLink
Model C assumes a combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs and deployment assuming <br />one entity (City, Lit San Leandro or other) were to build and maintain the network. <br />Model C — Combined Network Models <br />Figure 7.1. Medal CFina tial Snapshot <br />Financial Model Conclusions <br />The included pro formas (found in Appendix E) demonstrate that even with these <br />conservative assumptions, the City could be cash flow positive in a few years if it elects <br />to provide businesses with broadband services while enjoying the off-balance sheet <br />benefits of a city owned network, which are more difficult to quantify. <br />Summary: <br />• Each phase can be profitable, including Lit San Leandro (Phase 1); <br />• The model does not consider any savings from opportunistic builds; <br />• The model is only one potential model for the City; other forms of partnerships and <br />arrangements could be possible to deliver broadband service; <br />• The model does not show any cost savings the City might realize by connecting <br />facilities not currently on its fiber network (e.g., SL Family Aquatic Center and <br />117 <br />