Laserfiche WebLink
File #:18-164,Version:1 <br />Analysis <br />There are number of practical and cost-saving benefits to merging the PC and BZA. Preparing <br />hearing notices, mailings, and agenda packets for separate meetings requires a substantial amount <br />of staff time. Merging the two would require the PC to serve as both a recommending and deciding <br />body. <br />Approval Streamlining <br />There are currently a number of potential situations where a project application could be required to <br />go before the BZA, PC and City Council for approval. For example, if an applicant wishes to develop <br />a new condominium project, the applicant’s Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit would need <br />to be approved by the BZA, but the Tentative Tract Map would need a recommendation by the <br />Planning Commission with final approval by the City Council. This process adds about two extra <br />months to the application processing timeline because public hearings are required before three <br />different deciding bodies. In these situations, staff is required to prepare three different sets of <br />hearing notices, staff reports, findings, resolutions, and conditions of approval. A shortened timeframe <br />and reduced uncertainty through the approval process can be a significant factor in making San <br />Leandro a desirable location for developers interested in constructing projects that are consistent <br />with the City’s planning goals. <br />Fewer Meetings <br />The workload between the PC and BZA is typically uneven. In recent years, the BZA has had two or <br />three agenda items scheduled for each hearing while the PC has only one item. In the past five <br />years, the PC has canceled half of its regularly scheduled public hearings for lack of items, while the <br />BZA has canceled approximately 43% of its meetings. Both bodies have scheduled about the same <br />number of special meetings over the past five years. Merging the two bodies would not require <br />scheduling two hearings each month. Holding one meeting per month would reduce comp time and <br />overtime hours for staff, providing cost savings for the City and applicants. <br />Administrative Staff Resources <br />The Planning Services Division currently prepares agenda packets and advertises public hearings for <br />the BZA and PC twice a month. Cancelled meetings also require public noticing. Preparing legal <br />notices and mailing agenda packets for a public hearing, which are often times large in size, can take <br />anywhere from half a day to two full days of staff time for the Planning Division’s shared <br />administrative assistant, who also provides support for two other divisions. Merging the two bodies <br />together would eliminate duplicative administrative tasks and reduce the amount of preparatory time <br />by as much as half. The City Clerk’s staff would also benefit from a merger with fewer appointees to <br />process, train and monitor. <br />Training and Conference Participation <br />It is a substantial challenge and expense for the City to send members of the PC and BZA to outside <br />training and conferences. For example, sending all 14 members to the annual California League of <br />Cities’ Planning Commissioners Academy or the State Planning Conference, including registration, <br />City of San LeandroPage 2 of 46//2018 <br />powered by Legistar™ <br /> <br />