My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearing 2019 0204
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2019
>
Packet 2019 0204
>
5A Public Hearing 2019 0204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2019 3:43:39 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 3:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
2/4/2019
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
504
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Mogensen, Andrew <br />From:Kay, Jeff <br />Sent:Wednesday, December 12, 2018 1:38 PM <br />To:Liao, Thomas; Mogensen, Andrew <br />Subject:FW: Planning Commision's Nov 15th proposal for zoning code amendment and <br />exception <br /> <br /> <br />From: yvonne gee < <br />Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 12:15 PM <br />To: _Council <CityCouncil@sanleandro.org> <br />Subject: Planning Commision's Nov 15th proposal for zoning code amendment and exception <br /> <br />Dear San Leandro City Council, <br /> <br />First, I'd like to thank you for faithfully serving our city. <br /> <br />I am a 40+ year San Leandro resident as my family moved to Creekside in 1976, and aside from my time away <br />at college have remained a San Leandro resident and taxpayer. My mother and brother also have homes in San <br />Leandro. We love our city. <br /> <br />I am disturbed to learn that the Planning Commission proposed a Zoning Code amendment at a Nov 15th public <br />hearing. I believe you are considering their recommendation on Mon., Dec. 17th. The recommendation is to <br />allow an exception for any property zoned Professional Office (P) over 10,000 square feet in size and <br />surrounded by adjacent zoning districts with a 50-foot height limit to develop up to 50 feet in height. This <br />exception is regarding the proposal to build a new apartment complex and parking structure at 1388 Bancroft <br />Ave. 1388 Bancroft is larger than 10,000 sq. ft., and I believe the amendment's intent is to allow 50-ft structures <br />if there is an adjacent lot that is zoned for 50-ft or if the lot itself is larger than 10,000 sq. ft.. <br /> <br />As I understand it, there will also be a proposal on Dec 20 to the Planning Commission regarding an apartment <br />complex at 1388 Bancroft. The latest proposal details are: <br /> 3 stories <br /> 45 units <br /> 47 parking spaces + 8 visitor spaces <br /> No car stackers <br />I live nearby the Middle School and am quite familiar with this area Bancroft is part of my daily commute. This <br />is too large of a structure for that property. Bancroft Ave. is already a popular, well-trafficked road, it is fairly <br />congested, especially with the middle school traffic. Adding an apartment complex would further complicate <br />the traffic and exacerbates the safety of pedestrians and drivers -- especially during the school year. <br /> <br />While I am unable to make either meeting, I do have questions and serious concerns: <br /> <br />Parking: By code, 102 parking spots are required but the plan details 47 parking spaces for residents & 8 for <br />guests/visitors. With not enough parking spaces for the would-be residents and guests, where will the overflow <br />go? 1388 is a corner spot with bus stops and major traffic light intersection so it is expected that overflow would
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.