Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 19-226 <br />Per implementation guidelines, basic maintenance and safety projects should be prioritized, and <br />to the extent possible, include complete streets components and advanced technologies. <br />Prior to receiving funds, local agencies must annually submit a list of projects proposed to be <br />funded with RMRA funds to the CTC. Although the CTC is not an ‘approving’ body, project lists <br />will be reviewed to ensure that they include statutorily required information to establish eligibility <br />for funding. Failure to submit a project list to the CTC and establish annual eligibility will result in <br />forfeiture of monthly apportionments. Currently, there is no process to recoup lost apportionments, <br />which would be distributed to eligible agencies. <br />SB 1 requires that the project list include four components: <br />·Project Description <br />·The location of each proposed project (“citywide” is not an option) <br />·Schedule for completion <br />·Estimated useful life of improvement <br />California Streets and Highways Code Section 2034(a)(1) stipulates that the list must be pursuant <br />to an adopted budget (or budget amendment), approved at a public meeting, and that all projects <br />proposed to receive funding shall be included in the city’s budget. <br />The list cannot limit flexible use of funds, provided that funds are only used for eligible projects, <br />meaning that a city can fund projects in a given year not on the project list, or not fund projects that <br />were on the project list. At the end of the fiscal year, the City will report back to the CTC on the <br />locations of work performed. Per established guidelines, any listed projects not <br />started/completed can be moved to the next year’s list. Changes to the list do not require going <br />back to the CTC for an amendment. <br />In order to receive RMRA funding, a city or county must annually expend from its general fund for <br />street, road, and highway purposes an amount not less than the annual average of its <br />expenditures from its general fund during fiscal years 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 <br />(Streets and Highways Code Section 2036(b)). This is referred to as the ‘Maintenance of Effort’, <br />or MOE. If a city or county fails to meet the MOE in a fiscal year, it can be made up in the following <br />fiscal year. The CTC can audit to determine that the MOE was met, and non-compliant agencies <br />may have to reimburse the state. <br />Included in the MOE are unrestricted, discretionary funds including vehicle in-lieu tax revenues <br />and revenues from fines and forfeitures, expended for street, road, and highway purposes. <br />One-time allocations expended for street and highway purposes, but which may not be available <br />on an ongoing basis, including revenue provided under the Teeter Plan Bond Law of 1994, are <br />excluded. Additionally, HUTA funds are not part of the MOE calculation. <br />The projects performed in-house generally follow the Maintenance Area Map (where the City is <br />divided into quadrants with a different quadrant focus each year) and are coordinated with the <br />Engineering & Transportation Department to ensure that any required ADA ramp work is <br />scheduled. The information below lists proposed work for Fiscal Year 2020.City of San Leandro <br />In-House Streets Maintenance - FY 2020 <br />Page 3 City of San Leandro Printed on 4/30/2019