Laserfiche WebLink
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) <br />Identify the resources made available <br />Source of Funds SourceResources Made Amount Expended <br />Available During Program Year <br />CDBG public -federal 714,909 <br />Otherpublic -federal 0 <br />Table 3 - Resources Made Available <br />Narrative <br />CDBG: In FY 18-19 the City received a allocation of $714,909. The City released a Public Services RFP in <br />Spring 2017 used to determine projects with activities that are HUD-eligible serving low and moderate- <br />income persons. In FY 18-19 there was also $29,918 in prior year unallocated and unexpended funds <br />allocated. Note that the January 2018 default repayment of $300,000 from a FY 10-11 capital <br />improvement loan was not allocated in FY 18-19. In FY 19-20 City staff will work with HUD to determine <br />how to account for these funds. The City Council has tentatively committed to use those funds for the <br />Boy’s and Girl’s Club of San Leandro’s capital improvement campaign that addresses deferred <br />maintenance updates to their public facilities. <br />An update regarding Amendment No. 1 to the FY 10-11 Annual Action Plan that was adopted by City <br />Council (Resolution No. 2017-106) on 7/17/19 that reprogrammed $100,000 in CDBG funds. Unknown to <br />prior City staff, there was a negative balance in the City's HUD IDIS line of credit. Unfortunately, the City <br />had to use these funds to clear this negative balance. HUD’s Accounting Division indicated that the there <br />was $68,597.85 in FY 1997-98 grant funds that were used to pay a past due Section 108 loan <br />installment. HUD’s belief is that the 1997 grant was shown as the originating grant in the wire when the <br />City transferred funds in 2013. The authority to use the 1997 funds expired in 2004, and the funds in <br />question were automatically recaptured by the U.S. Treasury when the past due payment was made in <br />2013. On 8/9/18, HUD CPD Staff consulted the Entitlement Communities Division. Their staff reviewed <br />the email history between the City and HUD. Senior Staff at the Entitlement Communities Division were <br />also consulted. Based on the meeting and the information gathered from the emails, HUD determined <br />that these funds were recaptured by the U.S. Treasury in 2013 and were lost to the City. <br />HOME Program: The City participates in the Alameda County HOME Consortium, which is made up of <br />Alameda County cities (including unincorporated cities), excluding Berkeley and Oakland. The City <br />receives HOME funds via a formula allocation through the Consortium. A portion of those funds are used <br />for administrative overhead that covers staff costs. The rest of the funds are intended for housing <br />projects. Since the City’s annual allocation is not typically large enough to be used for a HOME eligible <br />housing program, Consortium cities pool their funds so that they can be used on a competitive and/or <br />rotating basis among member cities. <br />In FY 18-19, the City was allocated through the Consortium $244,691 of which $13,980 was allocated to <br />cover administrative overhead. The remaining $230,711 in funds were used to pay down construction <br />pool funding to City affordable housing developments. As was noted in last year’s CAPER, HOME <br /> City of San Leandro FY 2018-19 CAPER 7 <br />OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) <br /> <br />