Laserfiche WebLink
IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2019-161 <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO CITY COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE <br />THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROPRIATE UP TO $415,000 FROM THE CITY <br />AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSET FUND BALANCE TO PURCHASE A BELOW <br />MARKET RATE HOUSING UNIT AT 713 BLOOM STREET FOR RESALE TO AN <br />INCOME ELIGIBLE HOMEBUYER AND TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE AND SALE <br />AGREEMENT WITH AN INCOME ELIGIBLE FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER, WHICH <br />WOULD BE SUBJECT TO AN UPDATED PROPERTY VALUE RESTRICTIONS, <br />RESALE AGREEMENT, AND OPTION TO PURCHASE <br />WHEREAS, Ms. Stephanie Ransom -Clark purchased 713 Bloom Street, San Leandro, <br />California in 2003 with the help of the San Leandro Redevelopment Agency, which provided a <br />loan to finance her down payment as part of the Agency's program to facilitate home ownership <br />for low and moderate income persons; and <br />WHEREAS, as part of the down payment assistance, the Agency and Ms. Clark entered <br />into a Property Value Restrictions, Resale Agreement, and Option to Purchase (the "Agreement"), <br />effective April 24, 2003; and <br />WHEREAS, the Agreement gives the Agency the right of first refusal for any proposed <br />sale, and prohibits Ms. Clark from any sale unless the Agency gives consent. The Agreement <br />further provides that any sale price must be based on the original $247,000 purchase price, adjusted <br />for the Consumer Price Index (CPI.) Finally, the Agreement prohibits the owner from refinancing <br />the property to exceed 100% of its purchase price; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to State law that eliminated Redevelopment Agencies, the City <br />assumed and was assigned to enforce the Agreement; and <br />WHEREAS, in December 2017 Ms. Clark refinanced the property for $408,000 and did <br />not seek the City's consent. This refinancing breached the Agreement because the refinancing <br />exceeded 100% of the purchase price. In May 2018, Ms. Clark refinanced the property again for <br />$432,000 and did not seek the City's consent. In December 2018 Ms. Clark refinanced the property <br />again for $510,000 without the City's consent. When the City became aware of these breaches, the <br />City contacted Ms. Clark to attempt to bring her back into compliance, but she refused. In <br />addition, the City received notice that Ms. Clark was in default on the loans, and had also violated <br />the Agreement by not using it as her primary residence, and engaging in non -hosted short term <br />rental of the property; and <br />WHEREAS, OCMBC dba LoanStream, the company that executed the refinancings with <br />Ms. Clark, informed the City of its intent to sell its existing loan to an investor in exchange for Ms. <br />Clark granting the investor a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The investor would no longer be bound <br />by the affordability restrictions in the Agreement and the subject property would no longer be <br />available for low income housing. This was unacceptable to the City, which caused the City to file <br />suit against Ms. Clark and LoanStream; and <br />