Reso 2019-171 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Environmental Checklist Aesthetics General Plan Consistency Checklist 17 1 Aesthetics Significant Impact Less than Significant or Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated No Impact Analyzed in the Prior EIR Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? □ ■ □ ■ b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? □ □ ■ ■ c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced a from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? □ ■ □ ■ d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? □ ■ □ ■ Analysis in the General Plan EIR Impacts to aesthetics were analyzed in Section 4.1 of the General Plan EIR. Impacts to aesthetics were determined to be less than significant with no mitigation measures required (City of San Leandro 2016b). The following gives the analysis included in the General Plan EIR and provides a streamlined review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts not previously discussed in the General Plan EIR; or 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR due to substantial new information.