Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />Mineral Resources <br /> <br />General Plan Consistency Checklist 65 <br />12 Mineral Resources <br /> <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant or <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated No Impact <br />Analyzed in <br />the Prior EIR <br />Would the project: <br />a. Result in the loss of availability of a <br />known mineral resource that would be of <br />value to the region and the residents of <br />the state? □ □ ■ □ <br />b. Result in the loss of availability of a <br />locally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan, or other land <br />use plan? □ □ ■ □ <br />Analysis in the General Plan EIR <br />The General Plan EIR states no impacts to mineral resources would occur on pages 4-1 and 7-1. <br />The following describes the analysis included in the General Plan EIR and provides a streamlined <br />review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to <br />the project or the parcel on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in the <br />General Plan EIR as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative <br />impacts that were not previously discussed in the General Plan EIR; or 4) are now determined to <br />have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR due to substantial new <br />information. <br />Project-Specific Impacts <br />a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of <br />value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? <br />The project site is not zoned or designated for mining uses and no active mining operations are in <br />the project site or vicinity. The project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br />resource that would be of value to the residents of the state and the region, nor would it result in <br />loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. Because the project site is currently <br />developed, the project would not alter undeveloped land with the potential to contain valuable <br />mineral resources. There would be no impact. <br />NO IMPACT