Laserfiche WebLink
recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction, often benefit from living in a non -institu- <br />tional residential environment, which is frequently cost-effective and more humane and <br />therapeutic. The Council also finds that, under the federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. <br />3601 et seq., the City has an obligation to provide reasonable accommodation for the <br />disabled, including changing, waiving, and making exceptions to zoning rules that <br />would otherwise have the effect of limiting the ability of such individuals to live in the <br />residence of their choice in the community. The Council further finds that the preserva- <br />tion and protection of the character of residential neighborhoods is in the best interest <br />of the public health, safety, and welfare, and that over -concentration of residential fa- <br />cilities for the individuals listed above can impair the character of residential neighbor- <br />hoods, thereby defeating the very reason for providing residential accommodations for <br />such individuals. Thus, the Council concludes that a set of land use laws that flexibly <br />limits the concentration of residential facilities for the individuals listed above can bal- <br />ance the City's complementary interests in reasonably accommodating disabled indi- <br />viduals seeking a residential living environment and in preserving the character of res- <br />idential neighborhoods. The purpose of this section is to enact such a law. In enacting <br />this law, the Council has attempted to achieve the goals described above by removing <br />any special requirements for facilities for the disabled that would limit such individuals' <br />choice of places to live; to the extent that such residences are subject to requirements <br />different from those applicable to similar uses of land, the Council has concluded that <br />no less discriminatory alternatives exist that would as effectively promote its interests <br />in reasonable accommodation and the preservation of residential neighborhoods. <br />B. Residential Congregate Care Facilities as a Residential Use. Residential Congregate <br />Care Facilities, as defined in Section 1.12.108 Definitions, are considered a residential <br />use of property, and may be permitted in all Residential Districts, and all other Zoning <br />Districts in which residential uses are either permitted, conditionally permitted, or sub- <br />ject to administrative review, and subject to the limitations prescribed in this section. <br />C. Applicability of Regulations. Residential Congregate Care Facilities shall be subject to <br />the zoning requirements of this section, and any subdivision, housing, and building reg- <br />ulations and codes expressly applicable to such Facilities, including building and fire <br />safety requirements. Nothing in those regulations and codes shall be construed to pro- <br />hibit such Facilities from locating where a residential use would otherwise be permitted <br />or conditionally permitted. No privately created covenant, equitable servitude, or other <br />contract or agreement shall be used as the basis of denial of permission to operate a <br />Residential Congregate Care Facilities that has met all other applicable requirements. <br />D. Over -Concentration and Minimum Spacing. To prevent an over -concentration of Resi- <br />dential Congregate Care Facilities in the City, all new Facilities for which the contem- <br />plated number of residents is more than six (not including live-in staff), and existing <br />Facilities that wish to increase the number of residents to more than six, must be a <br />minimum distance of 1,000 feet from another such Facility. Nothing in this subsection <br />shall prevent more than one Facility from locating in an individual apartment/condomin- <br />Page 70 of 459 <br />City Council Hearing March 2, 2020 <br />