Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />RESOLUTION NO.2020-122 <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO CITY COUNCIL TO <br />SUPPORT PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 15, ALSO KNOWN AS THE CALIFORNIA <br />SCHOOLS AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES FUNDING ACT OF 2020 <br />WHEREAS, California local public agencies, including cities, counties, schools, and <br />special districts, levy property taxes on property owners based on the value of their property. <br />Property taxes raise around $65 billion annually for local governments, about $2 billion of which <br />is attributable to business personal property; and <br />WHEREAS, about 60 percent of statewide property tax revenue is allocated to cities, <br />counties, and special districts, while the remaining 40 percent is allocated to schools and <br />community colleges; and <br />WHEREAS, county assessors determine the taxable value of property, county tax <br />collectors bill property owners, and county auditors distribute the revenue among local <br />government; and <br />WHEREAS, each property owner's annual property tax bill is equal to the taxable value <br />of their property multiplied by their property tax rate. Property tax rates are capped at 1 percent <br />plus smaller voter approved rates to finance local infrastructure. A property's taxable value <br />generally is based on its purchase price. When a property is purchased, the county assessor <br />assigns a value to the property, typically its purchase price. Each year thereafter, the property's <br />taxable value increases by 2 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. This process <br />continues until the property is sold and again is taxed at its purchase price. In most years, the <br />market value of most properties grows faster than 2 percent per year. As a result, under this <br />system the taxable value of most properties is less than their fair market value; and <br />WHEREAS, partially as a result of the current property tax system cities and counties in <br />California have experienced underinvestment and significant budgetary challenges over the past <br />four decades that have impacted the critical services and infrastructure that residents rely <br />upon; and <br />WHEREAS, California's current property tax system allows some commercial and <br />industrial properties to avoid regular reassessment because changes in ownership have been <br />hidden from transparent disclosure; and <br />WHEREAS, academic researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) <br />demonstrated that a majority of commercial property owners in California already pay close to <br />market value, making the current system inequitable among businesses, benefitting large owners <br />who have held land for long periods of time; and <br />WHEREAS, such practices result in millions of dollars of forgone governmental revenue <br />that would otherwise help to support the provision of essential services in local communities; and <br />WHEREAS, according to the California Legislative Analyst's Office, Proposition 15, <br />otherwise known as the California Schools and Local Communities Funding Act of 2020, could <br />reclaim up to $12.5 billion in property tax revenue every year by reassessing commercial and <br />industrial properties at market rates; and <br />