My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2021-113 Adopt 2021 CAP and Addendum to 2035 General Plan
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2021
>
Reso 2021-113 Adopt 2021 CAP and Addendum to 2035 General Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2023 1:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/26/2021 12:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
7/19/2021
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
5A Public Hearings 2021 0719
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2021\Packet 2021 0719
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2021 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN <br />ADDENDUM NO.1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />3. Environmental Analysis <br />Also, like the Approved Project, some of the proposed 2021 CAP strategies and associated actions could <br />have the potential to result in physical impacts to the environment. These include the following: <br />■ ME-2: Municipal renewable energy. Install additional renewable energy generation and energy storage <br />systems, including solar hot water, at City facilities as appropriate and feasible. <br />■ AT-2: Bicycle infrastructure. Expand San Leandro's bicycle network and supportive bicycle infrastructure, <br />including funding buildout of the City's bicycle network as identified in the current Bicycle and <br />Pedestrian Master Plan, to meet commute trip, non -commute trip, and recreational needs. <br />■ AT-8: Autonomous vehicles. Explore opportunities to effectively reduce GHG emissions associated with <br />autonomous vehicles. (This is a supportive policy that does not create its own GHG emission reductions.) <br />■ TIE-2: EV charging stations. Increase the availability of publicly accessible EV charging stations at retail <br />centers, offices, and public facilities. <br />■ WM-1: Increased curbside recycling. Increase participation in curbside recycling programs, including <br />efforts to reduce material contamination and improvements to waste educational programs. <br />■ WR-5: Styrofoam and single -use plastics reduction. Continue to enforce bans on Styrofoam for food - <br />related businesses and explore opportunities to reduce single -use plastic items. (This is a supportive <br />policy that does not create its own GHG emission reductions.) <br />As previously stated, implementation of these strategies and any associated actions would be subject to <br />applicable federal, state, and/or City regulations and undergo an appropriate level of environmental review <br />and implement mitigation measures from the General Plan EIR as required. As demonstrated in the Certified <br />EIR, all impacts were found to be less than significant or less than significant with mitigation except for the <br />significant and unavoidable impacts in the environmental topics of air quality, GHG emissions, and <br />transportation. <br />The impacts associated with transportation were related to level of service, which is no longer a CEQA <br />concern. Additionally, the Approved Project would not generate any new vehicular trips. Therefore, <br />implementing the Modified Project would not result in a substantial increase in magnitude of the significant <br />and unavoidable transportation impacts of the Approved Project. <br />The impacts associated with air quality were considered significant and unavoidable because the General <br />Plan EIR is a program -level evaluation and it is not possible to predict the specific characteristics of the <br />construction and operation of future projects and accurately model their individual emissions, nor is that <br />appropriate within the scope of a programmatic EIR. Therefore, future development -level projects are <br />unknown, and impacts were conservatively determined to be significant and unavoidable. The General Plan <br />includes policies that would minimize emissions to the extent feasible. General Plan mitigation measures <br />would require implementation of BAAQMD-approved mitigation measures if subsequent environmental <br />review determines that applicants for future development in San Leandro could generate operational or <br />construction emissions in excess of the BAAQMD significance thresholds. An analysis of emissions <br />generated from the operation and construction of specific future projects allowed under the General Plan <br />would be compared to BAAQMD's project -level significance thresholds during individual environmental <br />Page 18 <br />PlaceWorks <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.