9H Consent - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Strategy page 5 of 9 Stage One: In collaboration with architectural consultant, create 2-3 alternatives to bring to the community stakeholders, based on input from STAKEHOLDERS Activities 1. Consult STAKEHOLDERS 2. Present findings with alternatives from the initial discovery process to the community through the public hearing process. Stage Two: Following feedback from the STAKEHOLDERS, establish three design alternatives. All three alternatives must pass a feasibility metric directive from the Public Works Department. Activities 1. Establish action/design alternatives. 2. Design alternatives will include the ambitions of the park based on due diligence, community input, Taylor memorialization and sanctity of life considerations. 3. Present findings with alternatives from the initial discovery process to the community through the public hearing process. Stage Three: Bring the park plan alternatives to a robust group of constituencies identified as the Community Park Work Group to reach consensus around a preferred alternative, understanding that there may be a hybrid of alternatives. Seed will facilitate the Community Work Group which Will consist of community stakeholders. The Community Work Group will serve as the hierarchy body that will delineate the merits of the various park proposals and help prioritize the final proposals for consideration. 1. Stage Four; Finalize three park options for presentation to the City Manager and the City Council for consideration. Identify priority recommendation for architectural rendering for final consideration and approval by the City Council. Activities 1. Complete architectural rendering of recommended park design 2. Presentation by project architect.