My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 01042022
>
5A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 8:56:26 AM
Creation date
6/9/2022 12:54:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
1/4/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-001 ZONING CODE SECTION 4.04.336, MULTI-FAMILY AND MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL DEV
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Objective Development Standards <br />City Council Draft Code Amendments <br />A-119 <br />G. All site plan elements in the DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, and DA-6 Districts shall be reviewed for general <br />consistency with the Design Guidelines contained in the Downtown San Leandro Transit -Oriented <br />Development Strategy. <br />H. Site Plan Review Standards-Residential Single Unit Development. To approve or conditionally <br />approve a Site Plan for a single dwelling unit, the decision-maker or the decision making body shall <br />find that the proposed project is in substantial compliance with all of the following standards: <br />1. The Residence’s Architecture is Appropriate and Consistently Applied. The structure has <br />adequate articulation, with appropriate window placement, architectural detailing, roof <br />forms and/or changes in wall planes to provide visual interest. Additions shall not have a <br />“tacked on” appearance, and either the addition should be consistent with the existing <br />residence in terms of design and use of materials, or the existing residence should be <br />remodeled concurrently with construction of the proposed addition in order to achieve the <br />desired consistency. <br />2. The Visual Mass of the Home is De-Emphasized. The home appears in scale with the <br />surrounding homes. The building’s surfaces should be articulated in a manner that re- <br />duces the appearance of blocky or massive features, and architectural features, detailing <br />and/or landscaping should subdue, rather than accentuate the prominence of larger <br />homes. <br />3. The Neighborhood’s Existing Visual Character is Valued. The proposal “fits in” to the <br />neighborhood’s existing architectural and landscape context, utilizing a compatible <br />architectural vocabulary and retaining existing trees to the degree feasible and where <br />conducive to achieving the purposes of this chapter. The landscaping to be retained and/or <br />provided around the new and/or remodeled residence should include an appropriate <br />balance of trees, shrubs and living ground covers, and should be designed to blend the <br />project into its larger setting. <br />4. The Physical Impacts to Neighbors Are Minimized. The proposed home or addition does <br />not substantially impair the privacy and access to light and air of adjacent residences, <br />while balancing the applicant’s ability to improve the subject property in accordance with <br />all applicable restrictions. <br />1.5. View Preservation Standard, RS-VP District. To approve or conditionally approve a Site Plan <br />in the RS-VP District, the decision-maker or the decision-making body shall also find that <br />the proposed construction does not unreasonably block or diminish neighbors’ views of <br />distant and scenic features, such as the San Francisco Bay and surrounding open spaces <br />and skylines, while balancing the applicant’s ability to im-prove the subject property in <br />accordance with the applicable restrictions <br />5.12.128 Conditions of Approval <br />In approving a Site Plan Review, reasonable conditions may be imposed as necessary to achieve <br />consistency with the intent of the applicable District’s development standards and the standards of this <br />168
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.