Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment: Why Reducing Parking Requirements Near Transit Is a Key Lever <br />San Leandro's draft Multi-Family Development Standards plan seeks to make it more feasible to <br />build housing in San Leandro, and the 2035 Climate Action Plan seeks to significantly reduce <br />vehicle miles traveled. But while city staff and scientific research are unanimous in finding that <br />off-street parking requirements obstruct both affordable housing and greener lifestyles, the draft <br />standards make only minor changes to these requirements, and preserve the least necessary <br />requirements - those for developments a quarter mile from major transit stops. <br />Right now, it is difficult to live without a car in San Leandro, and this is the direct result of a built <br />environment that privileges car use. The only way to change our system to promote <br />transit-oriented development is by allowing housing near transit to come with less parking. <br />We ask that the city amend the draft standards to reduce off-street parking in multifamily-zoned <br />areas very close to public transit as follows: <br />Zones DA, SA, and RM (all multifamily zones subject to standards) <br />Distance from major transit <br />stop <br />Less than 0.5 miles:At least 0.5 miles, but less <br />than 1 mile: <br />Minimum off-street parking <br />required <br />No minimum 0.5 per unit <br />Maximum allowed 1 space per unit 1.5 per unit <br />Off-street parking requirements near transit hurt San Leandro by: <br />1.Increasing the cost of housing for low-income families as well as for the middle <br />class.Garage parking typically costs $20-30,000 per space (or more) to build. Current <br />RM parking requirements averaging about 2.5 spaces per unit effectively mean a <br />building must dedicate as much floor area for cars as it does for people. Most often, as <br />the city found in its site analysis, they mean nothing gets built at all. Cities that have <br />reduced their parking requirements have seen more affordable and mixed-income <br />housing built*. <br />2. Increasing car ownership, congestion, and carbon emissions.Free off-street <br />parking is a subsidy to car use. Studies show after similar people move to a home with <br />off-street parking versus one without, they are more likely to buy a car, or to buy a <br />second car, or to use their cars more. After all, they have free storage. This increases <br />car emissions and further clogs our streets - it even increases how many people park on <br />the curb. <br />3. Preventing the development of a walkable city.When half the city is devoted to <br />parking, the parking pushes everything in the city farther apart: small businesses can't <br />rely on foot traffic. And when seniors can no longer drive, the city suddenly becomes <br />unlivable to them. <br />175