Laserfiche WebLink
Objective Development Standards <br />City Council Draft Code Amendments <br />A-93 <br />2. Obsolete and unused equipment, such as roof-mounted utilities, exterior manufacturing <br />equipment, and unused pole sign and wall sign cabinets shall be removed, as required. <br />3. The effects of past “deferred maintenance,” where such has been identified, shall be <br />corrected by such effort as repainting, repaving, restriping, replanting of existing landscape <br />areas, and removal of unused equipment, vehicles, and debris. <br />F. All site plan elements in the SA-1, SA-2, and SA-3 Districts shall be reviewed for general consistency <br />with the Design Guidelines contained in the East 14th Street South Area Development Strategy. <br />G. All site plan elements in the DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, and DA-6 Districts shall be reviewed for general <br />consistency with the Design Guidelines contained in the Downtown San Leandro Transit -Oriented <br />Development Strategy. <br />H. Site Plan Review Standards-Residential Single Unit Development. To approve or conditionally <br />approve a Site Plan for a single dwelling unit, the decision-maker or the decision making body shall <br />find that the proposed project is in substantial compliance with all of the following standards: <br />1. The Residence’s Architecture is Appropriate and Consistently Applied. The structure has <br />adequate articulation, with appropriate window placement, architectural detailing, roof <br />forms and/or changes in wall planes to provide visual interest. Additions shall not have a <br />“tacked on” appearance, and either the addition should be consistent with the existing <br />residence in terms of design and use of materials, or the existing residence should be <br />remodeled concurrently with construction of the proposed addition in order to achieve the <br />desired consistency. <br />2. The Visual Mass of the Home is De-Emphasized. The home appears in scale with the <br />surrounding homes. The building’s surfaces should be articulated in a manner that re- <br />duces the appearance of blocky or massive features, and architectural features, detailing <br />and/or landscaping should subdue, rather than accentuate the prominence of larger <br />homes. <br />3. The Neighborhood’s Existing Visual Character is Valued. The proposal “fits in” to the <br />neighborhood’s existing architectural and landscape context, utilizing a compatible <br />architectural vocabulary and retaining existing trees to the degree feasible and where <br />conducive to achieving the purposes of this chapter. The landscaping to be retained and/or <br />provided around the new and/or remodeled residence should include an appropriate <br />balance of trees, shrubs and living ground covers, and should be designed to blend the <br />project into its larger setting. <br />4. The Physical Impacts to Neighbors Are Minimized. The proposed home or addition does <br />not substantially impair the privacy and access to light and air of adjacent residences, <br />while balancing the applicant’s ability to improve the subject property in accordance with <br />all applicable restrictions. <br />5. View Preservation Standard, RS-VP District. To approve or conditionally approve a Site Plan <br />in the RS-VP District, the decision-maker or the decision-making body shall also find that <br />274