My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 01042022
>
5A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 8:56:26 AM
Creation date
6/9/2022 12:54:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
1/4/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-001 ZONING CODE SECTION 4.04.336, MULTI-FAMILY AND MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL DEV
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
File Number: 21-758 <br />Currently, the Site Plan Review procedure for projects in nonresidential and mixed-use districts is <br />standardized. However, in the residential districts, there are two types of Site Plan Review, major <br />and minor, whose procedures vary depending on specific project characteristics. The draft <br />amendments propose to standardize Site Plan Review procedures by establishing three levels of <br />Site Plan Review, as noted in Attachment 2 (Proposed Site Plan Review Process). <br />The amendments also clarify that the Site Plan Review process will run concurrently with any other <br />discretionary permits according to the permit with the highest level of review authority. The <br />proposed Site Plan Review procedure amendments would shift the review authority for new <br />homes larger than 4,000 square feet and new homes or additions that exceed the single story/18 <br />foot height limit in the RS-VP District to the ZEO rather than the BZA. However, the ZEO’s <br />decisions would be appealable to the BZA or the project could be elevated to the BZA for <br />approval where the ZEO determines the public interest would be better served by having the BZA <br />conduct Site Plan Review. <br />Miscellaneous: Other amendments include removing ‘Parking Exception’ as a specific approval <br />type and processing requests via Major Site Plan Review at a noticed public hearing by the ZEO <br />rather than the BZA. The amendments also include deleting references to the obsolete Site <br />Development Subcommittee. <br />Planning Commission Public Hearing <br />On November 4, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and took public testimony <br />on the proposed Objective Standards Amendments. The Commission received a letter from a <br />local organization, San Leandro 2050, requesting that the parking reductions proposed by staff <br />be further reduced and extended to the Multi-Family (RM) Districts to reduce the cost of housing <br />and advance environmental goals (See Attachment 4). Four public commenters spoke at the <br />hearing with mixed perspectives on parking reductions. <br />After deliberation, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution recommending approval of <br />the proposed amendments to the City Council on a 6-0 vote (Commissioner Mendoza absent) <br />with the following modifications: <br />1) Add shared use car space(s) as an amenity option to Section 4.4.336(B)(4) <br />2) Eliminate parking minimums and establish a 0.5 space/unit parking space for all new <br />Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Developments in the DA and SA Districts <br />3) Require 15% of actual parking provided in the DA and SA Districts to provide Electric <br />Vehicle (EV) chargers; and <br />4) Require a minimum of 1 bicycle parking space/unit to supplement reduced parking for DA <br />and SA Districts <br />Staff is supportive of all of the above changes with the exception of Item 2 above related to the 0.5 <br />parking space/unit maximum. Local developers have expressed concerns about high parking <br />minimums and low parking maximums, which hinder their ability to respond to market demands <br />for housing. Staff anticipates that the 0.5 parking space/unit maximum could further curtail housing <br />development in San Leandro and lead to negative parking outcomes for surrounding <br />Page 8 City of San Leandro Printed on 12/30/2021 <br />26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.