11B Public Hearings - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXHIBIT A FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATIONS CEQA, Planned Development Project, Site Plan Review PLNs 21-0020, 21-0021, 22-0008 Monarch Bay Shoreline Development APN’s 080G 0900 001 08, 080G 0900 004 01, 079A 0475 009 04, 079A 0590 001 05, 079A 0590 001 07, 079A 0590 002 00, 079A 0590 003 00, and 079A 0590 004 00 Monarch Bay LLC (applicant) and City of San Leandro (owner) CEQA Findings 1. Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds, on the basis of substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the EIR, the First Addendum, the Second Addendum, the Third Addendum and all related information presented to the City Council, that the environmental effects of the Project were sufficiently analyzed and that an addendum to the EIR is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed Project. The City Council further finds that none of the circumstances described in the CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR exist because the proposed Project:  will not result in substantial changes in the Project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and  will not result in substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and  does not present new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified showing any of the following: a. that the proposed Project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; b. that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents declined to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; and d. that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; and 2. Having considered the administrative record, the EIR, the First Addendum, Second Addendum, Third Addendum, and all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds that all environmental impacts of the proposed Project