My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 22 PlaceWorks <br />butterflies, special-status fish and other aquatic species, and nesting birds which, are protected under <br />State and federal regulations. <br /> <br />The Original Project included 64 townhomes, 42 single family residences, and 28 townhomes within the <br />existing 32-acre golf course. Development for the Original Project avoided the stand of blue gum <br />eucalyptus habitat where the winter roosting colony of monarch butterflies congregate at the eastern <br />edge of the golf course. However, the South Golf Course Residential Component of the Original Project <br />was located directly adjacent to the monarch butterfly habitat, which likely provides important wind <br />buffering functions and could provide nectaring and resting locations for individual butterflies. Although <br />these residences avoided most of the trees, there remained the possibility that construction and/or <br />vegetation management activities by future residences could adversely affect these trees and result in <br />indirect adverse effects on the butterfly colony. Furthermore, monarch butterfly winter roosting habitat <br />could be adversely affected if adequate controls on tree removal and pruning are not implemented. <br />Short-term impacts such as construction-generated fumes and dust could adversely affect roosting <br />butterflies if construction is initiated or performed in close proximity during the overwintering period, <br />generally from October 1 to March 1. The Original Project found that this would be a significant impact. <br /> <br />In contrast, the Approved Project included 152 single family residences and 48 residential townhomes <br />which are pulled closer to Monarch Bay Drive on the west and Fairway Drive to the south, respectively. <br />Although the 152 single family residences and 48 residential townhomes for the Approved Project <br />represented in a larger development east of Monarch Bay Drive in comparison to the Original Project, the <br />proposed structures are located approximately 600 feet to the west of the blue gum eucalyptus and pines <br />which are located on the eastern portion of the remaining golf course. Therefore, the First Addendum <br />found that the shift in development area would represent a potential avoidance and reduction in impacts <br />to habitat for the winter roosting colony of monarch butterflies. The additional 6 townhome units from <br />the Modified Project would be located within the same footprint of the site plan from the Approved <br />Project and would not result in additional encroachment into the monarch butterfly habitat. <br /> <br />To reduce the potential impact to the monarch butterfly habitat to less than significant, the Original <br />Project Certified EIR included Mitigation Measure BIO-1A detailed in Chapter 4.3, Biological Resources, of <br />the Certified EIR. The Mitigation Measure would also be implemented for the Modified Project, which <br />includes the preparation of a Monarch Butterfly Roosting Habitat Protection Program (MBRHPP). <br />Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1A, the Modified Project would not result in a <br />new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts to the winter roost colony of <br />monarch butterflies. <br /> <br />The Original Project included improvements to shoreline areas of tidally influenced open water resulting <br />in potential direct and indirect effects on several special-status fish species. The Original Project found <br />that construction could cause disturbance to aquatic habitat of the bay, requiring drilling and excavation <br />for pier/dock installation and shoreline modification, and suspending silts and other substrate within the <br />construction zone, resulting in a temporary reduction in water quality, or inadvertent injury or loss of <br />individual special-status fish species, if present within the construction zone. These impacts were <br />considered a significant impact for the Original Project for which appropriate construction avoidance <br />measures, implemented as part of Mitigation Measure BIO-1B were necessary to prevent possible loss of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.