My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />May 2022 Page 27 <br />4.6 ENERGY <br />4.6.1 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MODIFIED PROJECT <br />Would the project: <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Project <br />Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Circumstanc <br />es Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />New <br />Information <br />Showing <br />New or <br />Increased <br />Significant <br />Effects <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impacts/No <br />Changes or <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring <br />Preparation <br />of a <br />Subsequent <br />EIR/MND No Impact <br />a) Result in potentially significant <br />environmental impact due to wasteful, <br />inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of <br />energy resources, during project <br />construction or operation? <br /> x <br />b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or <br />local plan for renewable energy or energy <br />efficiency? <br /> x <br /> <br />Background: <br />2022 Appendix G Threshold <br />The CEQA Checklist Guidelines for Energy were added since those used for the Certified EIR of the <br />Original Project. <br /> <br />Comments: <br />ENER-a., ENER-b. <br />Compared to the Approved Project (including the First Addendum), the Modified Project would result in a <br />net increase of 6 residential units (townhomes), an increase of 1.2 percent over the Approved Project, <br />and a net reduction of 1,027 square feet of project building area. The Modified Project would have less <br />building area and soil hauling than the Original Project, and it would require less electricity and <br />transportation fuel during construction. Overall, a 1.2 percent increase in the number of residential units <br />with the Modified Project would not result in more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of <br />energy resources than similar projects and would not cause a new conflict with or obstruct a state or local <br />plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The Modified Project would not conflict with the City <br />CAP. Therefore, taking together both short-term impacts related to energy use during project <br />construction and long-term impacts related to energy use at the project site, the Modified Project would <br />not result in a new impact or in a substantial increase in magnitude of existing impacts resulting in <br />potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of <br />energy resources, during project construction or operation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.