MO 2002-041 to 2002-045 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXHIB] City C vey Oral Communications A B C D E F G LOCATION OF ORAL CHANGE OF CAN CITIZENS ADDRESS IS A TIME LIMIT MEETING CITY COMMUNICATION ON PLACEMENT PRIOR EACH AGENDA ITEM AS IT PLACED ON TELEVISED? OC COMMENTS AGENDA TO ELECTION Alameda At the end No COMES UP SPEAKERS TELEVISED? No, No 2 Yes 3 minutes 3 Albany At the end No Yes 5 minutes Yes, Yes Meetings also on internet 4 Alhambra At the end No Yes 5 minutes Yes, Yes 5 Aliso Viejo At the end No new city) Yes 3 minutes Yes, Yes 6 Atascadero No Yes 5 minutes No, No Location changed Meetings taped and televised at 7 Bellflower At the beginning several times Yes Reasonable time Yes, Yes later date 8 IBuellton At the beginning Yes 3 minutes Yes, Yes 9 Buena Park At the end No Yes 5 minutes No, No PH items 5 minutes; beginning of closed session 3 minutes; non - agenda city matters 1 minute; agenda items 4 minutes. At the end, non -agenda city matters 10 Burbank ___ _At the beginning and end No No 3 minutes Yes 30 minute limit on public 11 California City At the beginning Yes 3 minutes comments Changing the placement of Oral Communications received a lot of criticism and negative feedback because the challengers were campaigning during public comments. This year it was moved back to beginning of agenda. Suggested limiting total amount of time spent for public 12 Car interia Near the beginning No Yes 5 minutes comments. 13 Chino After Consent and PH's No Yes 5 minutes Yes At the beginning, after 3 minutes (PH items - 5 14 Chula Vista consent No Yes minutes) Yes, Yes 6111 /02