My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-041 to 2002-045
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-041 to 2002-045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:33:38 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 12:24:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT <br />Table 5-3: Parking Requirements for New Housing <br />Unit Type <br />Parking Required <br />Single Family Home <br />2 non -tandem covered spaces <br />Single Family Home in Mulford Gardens (RO District) <br />2 spaces, may be tandem and uncovered <br />Duplex <br />2 spaces per unit, one of which must be covered <br />Single Family Home with a Second Unit <br />3 non -tandem spaces required <br />Multi- <br />Studio or One Bedroom <br />1.5 spaces per unit, including 1 covered (*) <br />Family <br />Two bedroom unit <br />2.25 spaces per unit, including 2 covered (*) <br />(3+ units) <br />Three or more bedroom <br />2.5 spaces per unit, including 2 covered (*) <br />Senior Housing <br />1.2 per unit, including 1 covered, plus one space per <br />employee <br />(*) .25 spaces per unit of the required number must be reserved for guest parking <br />Source: Barry Miller, AICP 2002 <br />Section 5-2212 indicates that such exceptions may be granted if- <br />* the strict application of the parking standards would cause "particular difficulty or undue hardship"; <br />or <br />• the proposed parking is as close to compliance as possible with the standards in the Zoning Code. <br />Conclusions. Adjustments to the multi -family parking standards should be considered for projects <br />located near transit facilities. One possibility would be to reduce the parking requirement by a fixed <br />percentage, such as 10 percent for projects along major bus corridors and 20 percent for projects within '/4 <br />mile of a BART Station. Another might be to reduce parking for projects that provide BART shuttle <br />service or contribute to existing shuttle services. Another would be to keep parking exceptions <br />discretionary, but add a third condition (proximity to transit) under which they could be justified. <br />Other adjustments to the parking standards might also facilitate housing production. These could include <br />allowing a greater percentage of the spaces to be uncovered, allowing tandem parking (outside the front <br />yard setback) in some circumstances, dropping the off-street guest parking requirement for small (e.g., <br />less than four unit) buildings, or reducing the standards for small (e.g., less than four unit) buildings. The <br />requirement for studio apartments could be lowered, perhaps to 1.0 or 1.25 spaces per unit instead of 1.5 <br />spaces per unit. Standards for shared parking also might be considered. For example, a 15 percent <br />reduction in the cumulative number of spaces for a project might be granted for projects combining office <br />and residential uses (because the uses have different peaking characteristics). <br />HOUSING ELEMENT 5-9 SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN <br />'y (0 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.