My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2001-036 to 2001-040
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2001
>
MO 2001-036 to 2001-040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 1:27:35 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 1:21:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ISSUES <br />Place within a 100-year flood hazard area <br />structures that would impede or redirect flood <br />flows? <br />Expose people or structures to a significant risk <br />of loss, injury or death involving flooding, <br />including flooding as a result of the failure of a <br />POTENTIALLY <br />POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN NO <br />SIGNIFICANT UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT ESAPACT SOURCES <br />ISSUES MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />X 11 <br />X 11 <br />levee or dam? X 2,13 <br />Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X 2,13 <br />k. Exposure of people property to water related <br />hazards such as tidal waves? <br />EXPLANATION: The project site itself is fairly level, with development, including abandoned industrial buildings and paving <br />existing on a portion of the project site, To date, a site -specific or project -specific hydrological study has not been performed. Given <br />the existing on -site soils, the type of development proposed, and due to the fact that San Leandro Creek forms the northern project <br />boundary, it can be anticipated that implementation of the proposed project may result in potentially significant impacts related to <br />water quality, groundwater, drainage patterns, and increased rum -off. The following mitigation measures are recommended in order <br />to reduce potentially significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality to a less than significant level: <br />Prior to adoption of the Final Map, a site -specific hydrology study shall be puse and degradation, minimumaffects the <br />potential impacts of the proposed project with regards to water quality, groundwater <br />on <br />existing drainage patterns, and the potential for increased run-off. The hydrology study shall be submitted to the City <br />Engineer for review and approval. <br />Prior to issuance of grading permits for each phase of construction, an erosion control plan shall be developed for the <br />site in order to minimize any erosion that may occur during grading. Protection measures may include implementing silt <br />fencing, hay bales and/or sand bags. The erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Alameda <br />County Flood Control District for review and approval. <br />In accordance with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination(NPDES) advisinit,g the <br />the <br />applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />project is under consideration for construction. The applicant shall submit proof of approval from the RWQCB to the <br />City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. To control storm water pollution, the applicant shall comply with the <br />regulations and provisions contained in the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention <br />Permit, and the NPDES, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. <br />The project site is located within flood Zone C, described as an "Area of Minimal. Flooding' on the Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />(FIRM), Therefore, potential flooding impacts are anticipated less than significant The site is several miles inland from the San <br />Francisco Bay shore. Hence, the potential for inundation due to tsunami and/or seiche is considered remote. <br />ement or air <br />AIR QUALITY. Where a�'ailable, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality ma <br />DolIution control district may be relied upon to make the folloi� ina d terminations. tiVould't1Y projeI t: <br />Conflict with or obstruct implementation of Me <br />applicable air quality Plan? — <br />Violate any air quality standard or contribute <br />substantially to an existing or projected air <br />quality violation? <br />Result in a cumulatively considerable net <br />increase of any criteria pollutant for which the <br />project region is non -attainment under an <br />applicable federal or state ambient air quality <br />standard (including releasing emissions which <br />exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone <br />41 <br />C. <br />Preda Street Homes - Initial Study Checklist <br />`7$ <br />►0 <br />X <br />January 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.