Laserfiche WebLink
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is <br />unstable, or that would become unstable as a <br />result of the project, and potentially result in <br />X <br />2 <br />on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, <br />subsidence, liquefaction or collapse: <br />d. Be located on expansive soil, creating <br />X <br />2 <br />substantial risks of life or property? <br />e. Have soils capable of adequately supporting <br />the use of septic tanks or alternative waste <br />X <br />2 <br />water disposal systems where sewers are not <br />available for the disposal of waste water? <br />f. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, <br />X <br />2 <br />either on- or off -site? <br />g. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach <br />, <br />sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or <br />erosion which may modify the channel of a <br />X <br />2 <br />river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any <br />bay, inlet or lake? <br />EXPLANATION: Development potential would either be equal to, reduced from, and/or subject to additional discretionary review <br />when compared to existing regulations, as outlined in Attachment A -Project Description to this report. Project review pursuant to <br />evaluation of geology and soils would remain unchanged from existing City policy. <br />' HYDROLOGY AND WATER,QUALITY. Would theproject: <br />Violate any water quality standards or waste <br />X <br />2 <br />discharge requirements? <br />b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or <br />interfere substantially with groundwater <br />recharge such that there would be a net deficit <br />in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local <br />groundwater table level (e.g., the production <br />X <br />2 <br />rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to <br />a level which would not support existing land <br />uses or planned uses for which permits have <br />beengranted? <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern <br />of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river, in <br />X <br />2 <br />a manner which would result in substantial <br />erosion or siltation on- or off -site? <br />d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern <br />of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river, or <br />X <br />2 <br />substantially increase the rate or amount of <br />surface runoff in a manner which would result <br />in flooding on- or off -site? <br />e. Create or contribute runoff water which would <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide <br />X <br />2 <br />substantial additional sources of polluted <br />runoff? <br />f. Otherwise substantially degrade water uali ? <br />X <br />2 <br />011 <br />n%ning Code Amendments - IS/ND 4 January 2001 <br />