My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2001-086 to 2001-090
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2001
>
MO 2001-086 to 2001-090
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 1:41:03 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 1:39:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Jermanis <br />October 31, 2001 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />An estimate of the revenue loss that will occur upon implementation of the tax exemption and <br />rebate program is based on a number of assumptions. Up to 70% of the City's Real Property <br />Transfer Tax is generated by residential sales. Staff has been in discussion with representatives <br />of the real estate industry to develop an estimate of the probable revenue consequences of <br />adopting the proposed amendments to the Real Property Transfer Tax. In Calendar Year 2000, <br />approximately 46% of the Alameda County home sales were to first-time homebuyers. To date <br />in 2001, the percentage has been reduced to 38%. <br />First-time homebuyers will likely represent the largest group to benefit from an amendment to <br />the Real Property Transfer Tax. In most instances, first-time homebuyers are purchasing homes <br />at the lower end of the range of sales values. An estimate of the total revenue attributed to first- <br />time homebuyers assumes the following: 1). purchase of a home at 90% of the median value of <br />$350,000; 2). no limit on the value of the homes subject to the tax relief; 3). 100% of the <br />transaction tax is exempt. Assuming the number of qualifying purchasers eligible for the tax <br />rebate is between 35% and 50% of the single family home purchasers, the estimated revenue loss <br />would be between $600,000 and $1 million per year. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The information summarized in Attachment 1 suggests that the elements of the proposed Real <br />Property Transfer Tax amendment that are in question are limited to the following: <br />1. Whether the tax relief applies 100% of the transaction tax for qualifying properties, or to <br />50% of the tax which is the assumed amount paid by the purchaser. <br />2. Whether any value home purchased by a first time homebuyer should qualify for the <br />rebate or whether the program should be limited to homes at or below 125% of the <br />median value for the prior year. <br />3. Whether there should be a sunset provision, and if so, for how many years should the <br />program run before the sunset is applied. <br />Estimated cost of providing for certain exemptions to the Real Property Tax could be as high as <br />$1,200,000 per year. The cost would be reduced if the tax is limited to 50% of the eligible <br />transaction costs or if the value of homes eligible for the first-time rebate is limited. <br />Once the City Council provides direction on the Real Property Tax amendments, an ordinance <br />and administrative procedures for implementation will be brought back for Council <br />consideration. <br />33z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.