My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2000-016 to 2000-020
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2000
>
MO 2000-016 to 2000-020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 2:43:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2000
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) Credit quality. When a district is requested by a developer, the City will <br />carefully evaluate the applicant's financial plan and ability to carry the <br />project, including the payment of assessments and special taxes during build - <br />out. This may include detailed background, credit and lender checks, and the <br />preparation of independent appraisal reports and market absorption studies. <br />For districts where one property owner accounts for more than 25% of the <br />annual debt service obligation, a letter of credit further securing the financing <br />may be required. <br />4) Reserve fund. A reserve fund should be established in the lesser amount of: <br />the maximum annual debt service; 125% of the annual average debt service; <br />or 10% of the bond proceeds. <br />5) Value -to -debt ratios. The minimum value -to -debt ratio should generally be <br />4:1. This means the value of the property in the district, with the public <br />improvements, should be at least four times the amount of the assessment or <br />special tax debt. In special circumstances, after conferring and receiving the <br />concurrence of the City's financial advisor and bond counsel that a lower <br />value -to -debt ratio is financially prudent under the circumstances, the City <br />may consider allowing a value -to -debt ratio of 3:1. Special findings should <br />be made by the Council in this case. <br />6) Capitalized interest during construction. Decisions to capitalize interest will <br />be made on a case -by -case basis, with the intent that if allowed, it should <br />improve the credit quality of the bonds and reduce borrowing costs, <br />benefiting both current and future property owners. <br />7) Maximum burden. Annual assessments (or special taxes in the case of Mello - <br />Roos or similar districts) should generally not exceed 1% of the sales price of <br />the property; and total property taxes, special assessments and special tax <br />payments collected on the tax roll should generally not exceed 2%. <br />8) Benefit apportionment. Assessments and special taxes will be apportioned <br />according to a formula that is clear, understandable, equitable and reasonably <br />related to the benefit received by — or burden attributed to — each parcel with <br />respect to its financed improvement. Any annual escalation factor should <br />generally not exceed 2%. <br />9) Special tax district administration. In the case of Mello -Roos or similar <br />special tax districts, the total maximum annual tax should not exceed 11% of <br />annual debt service. The rate and method of apportionment should include a <br />back-up tax in the event of significant changes from the initial development <br />plan, and should include procedures for prepayments. <br />10) Foreclosure covenants. In managing administrative costs, the City will <br />establish minimum delinquency amounts per owner, and for the district as a <br />whole, on a case -by -case basis before initiating foreclosure proceedings. <br />22's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.