My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1998-031 to 1998-035
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1998
>
MO 1998-031 to 1998-035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 4:11:05 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 4:08:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1998
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Bill Aids Local Government <br />in Fight Against Airport Noise <br />Although California has noise standards for the operation of aircraft and aircraft engines at <br />public airports, enforcement of the standards is largely a bureaucratic process that avoi0s <br />questions of public policy. That may change under a bill (S13 1853) introduced Feb. 19, <br />1998 in the California Senate by Sen. Quentin Kopp of San Francisco. <br />The bill would authorize a city or county to submit a written request to the state's <br />Department of Transportation for a public hearing on aircraft noise at or near an airport. <br />The department would be required to hold a public hearing within 60 days of receipt of such <br />a request, and the owner and operator of the airport would be required to participate in the <br />hearing. <br />The state's noise standards, like the federal government's standards, are defined as an annual <br />average "community noise equivalent level" of 65 dB. Present state law authorizes county <br />officials to designate an airport as a "problem airport" if airport noise exceeds the state's <br />standards. However, this action only produces more paperwork without effective political <br />review, since "problem airports" are merely required to submit noise monitoring data to the <br />state. <br />Under existing state regulations the Department of Transportation may grant a variance from <br />the state's noise standards, thus permitting aircraft at an airport to exceed the state's noise <br />standards. Under Kopp's bill, airports operating with a variance would be required to make <br />every reasonable effort to notify residents and businesses affected by a change in a published <br />flight path for aircraft at least 15 days before the date the change is scheduled to take effect. <br />The bill would permit a city or a county to request an investigation of alleged violations of <br />the variance, and the district attorney of the county in which the airport is located would be <br />required to investigate the allegations within 60 days. If the district attorney failed to <br />investigate within 90 days, the state's attorney general would be required to investigate the <br />allegations. Violation of the act would be a crime. <br />The text of the bill is posted on the Web site "No More Noise" (www. wenet.net/--hpb), <br />which also has the text of several bills in the U.S. Congress intended to minimize or <br />eliminate aircraft noise in certain areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.