MO 1998-031 to 1998-035 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SB 1153 file:///Cl/WEB/AIRPORT/SB 1853. HTM This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated local program: yes. THE, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 21669.5 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read: 21669.5. (a) For the purposes of this section, "variance" means a variance from noise standards adopted by the department pursuant to Section 21669 granted by the department pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 5000 of Chapter 6 of Division 2.5 of Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations). (b) Any city or county may submit a written request to the department for a public hearing regarding aircraft noise at or near an airport. (c) The department shall hold a public hearing within 60 days of receipt of a request pursuant to subdivision (a). The owner and operator of the airport shall participate in the hearing. (d) If a recommended published flight path for aircraft for an airport operating pursuant to a variance is scheduled to change, the airport shall make every reasonable effort to notify the residents and businesses that will be affected by that change at least 15 days before the date that. the change will take effect. (e) Upon request by a city or county regarding an airport operating pursuant to a variance, the district attorney of the county in which the airport is located shall investigate any alleged violation of the terms of the variance within 60 days of receipt of the request. If a district attorney fails to investigate a request pursuant to this section within 90 days of receiving that request, the Attorney General shall investigate the alleged violation of the terms of the variance. SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district because in that regard this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. However, notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the claim for reimbursement does not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from the State Mandates Claims Fund. Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless otherwise specified, the provisions of this act shall become operative on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the "r I