My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1997-021 to 1997-025
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1997
>
MO 1997-021 to 1997-025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 4:49:43 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 4:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />STAFF REPORT <br />DATE: April 28, 1997 <br />TO: John Jermanis, City Manager <br />FROM: June Catalano, Development Services D' ector <br />BY: Steve Emslie, Planning Manager and <br />Elizabeth Greene, Acting Project PI er <br />SUBJECT: Design Review <br />SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION <br />APPROVED AND FORWARDED <br />TO CITY COUNCIL <br />Jo ermanis <br />anager <br />The Planning Commission is interested in developing a Design Review program for projects deemed <br />important or very visible within the City. Design review programs have been used by other cities to ensure <br />that new development blends with existing buildings and creates a quality appearance. This program would <br />involve the development of design criteria and the selection of a design review panel to evaluate projects. <br />This report requests that the City Council direct the Planning Commission to develop a recommended design <br />review program for Council consideration and adoption. <br />Many cities have a design review process which allows them to monitor important projects. This process <br />ensures that development within the city reflects the community's values and heritage. By having a design <br />review process, these communities also have a sense of place; the community gains a uniqueness which is <br />apparent to visitors and residents alike. Examples of such cities are Santa Barbara and Mountain View. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The Planning Commission believes that it is in the City's best interest to have the design of major projects <br />subject to review early in the development process, when suggestions can be more easily incorporated into <br />the building design. The Planning Commission believes that a sub -commission made up of City Council, <br />Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments members should be created to develop the review <br />process. While the design review process should encourage quality architecture throughout the City, it <br />should not create an undue burden on developers. The process would not delay the development process and <br />should allow for creativity within the broad guidelines. <br />As part of the review process, design guidelines will be developed. Design review could proceed before <br />design guidelines are finalized. These guidelines would be used as the measure by which individual <br />developments would be evaluated. They would be provided to developers at the earliest possible <br />opportunity so that building designs could be planned with the standards in mind. <br />93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.