My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1996-001 to 1996-005
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1996
>
MO 1996-001 to 1996-005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 11:02:47 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 10:59:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1996
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limits on Mobilebome Rent Control, <br />Low -Income Rental Assistance. Initiative Statute. I 199 <br />Armament Against Proposition 199 <br />PROPOSITION 199 DEVASTATES SENIOR CITIZEN <br />MOBUZHOM OWNERS. <br />Thousands of widows, widowers and other seniors will face <br />logs of their mwbilehomes. <br />400,000 Califor*+iaw (mostly senior citizens) own <br />mebilehomea, but not the land they sit on. They rent a small <br />slice of bare land from a park owner. Unlike apartment tenants, <br />they own their homes. Some monthly space, rents are higher <br />than Social Security and retirement income. Senior <br />Mobilehome owners are trapped when rents increase. It costs <br />$10,000 to move the mobilehome, and available spaces are <br />scarce. Homeowners must either pay the rent or lose their <br />homes. Mobilehome owners who cant pay escalating space <br />runts lose their equity and their homes, <br />PROPOSITION 199 ,LETS MORILEHOMSE PARK <br />.LANDLORDS R41SE RENTS WITHOUT LDf S. <br />Without local rent protections, unlimited rent increases can <br />be heaped upon captive homeowners. An 83-year-ald Los <br />Angeles widow, faces the loss of her home of 20 years. Since <br />LA.. Countpe rent control ordinance aspired, her rent has risen <br />to $846 per month. while her Social Security ehWA totals only <br />$783. She faces eviction, repossession of her home, and total <br />disruption of her final years_ <br />Under Proposition 199, teas of thousands of vidows and <br />seniors wt71 face the loss of their homes. <br />A 'no' vote on Proposition 199 helps her keep her home_ <br />The AARP, Legislative Council for Older Americans and <br />Congress of California Seniors recommend that you vote 'no' <br />Fiease vote no oa the "Widows Eviction Initiative'. <br />PROPOSITION 199 TAKES AWAY RE, ASSISTANCE <br />FROM SENIORS, <br />Deny be misled. Propasitiort 199 removes m,obilehome rent <br />otections. <br />Proposition 199's sspgonsors are mobilehome park landlords <br />io want to raise Mobilehome rents without limit, whenever <br />...ey Choose. <br />Proposltiom 199's so-called •rental assistance' is a farce. <br />It gives a 109b discount on rents park owners alone <br />deteri <br />mne. <br />What good is a 10% discm mt after rents have risen 50%? <br />Few, if any, seniors will get the 'subsidy". <br />Don't be fooled by the fraud. <br />Remember the tobacco industry& fraudulent `No Smoking" <br />initiative? <br />Proposition 199 is just as phony. <br />Proposition 199 mould wipe out more than ,$300 million in <br />seniors' home equity. <br />For every $10 rent increase, mobilehome equity is likely to <br />decease by apprvcimately S1,000. <br />Proposition 199 woWd raise rents, wiping out hundreds of <br />millions in seniors' home equity. <br />Senior 06— would be irreparably harmed <br />PROPOSITION 199 GIVES POWER TO SACRAMENTO <br />POLITICIANS, AND TALES IT AWAY FROM LOCAL <br />VOTERS. <br />Proposition 199 phases oat over 90 local initiatives and <br />laws —laws paased by voters and local offiiciala. <br />Proposition 199 prohibits local voters from ever passing <br />another mobilehome rent protection law_ <br />It gives the State l eWlature all power over mobilehome <br />rents. <br />Don't give mote power to Sacramento politi©ans! <br />Proposition 199 wouldn't put a single police ofj`Fcer on the <br />street <br />Mobilehome rent protections are funded by fees paid by <br />moWehome and park owners They cost taxpayers very little. <br />VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 199. <br />DAVE BENhBS" <br />Preaidan; Coldem State ifobahome Drones <br />Leagueresm L) <br />MARY TUCXER <br />Stage Leg#latioe Committee Chair, <br />Amerman Asseetasion of Retired Persona (AARp) <br />LBIS WPIJI vGWN <br />Prtrident, Cerwr— of Caliph mia semiov <br />Rebuttal to Argument Against Proposition 199 <br />A small special interest group, trying to protect their <br />$300 million ooindfadl profit, has resorted to deceptive <br />Statewide, mohilehome tests pav average space rent of <br />ciauas. <br />The vlettms are tens Of of thousanda of California families denied <br />affordable housing by ill-conceived <br />approximately $300 per month. <br />Average statewide rents equal just 28% of social security <br />rent regulations. <br />income. <br />THE FACTS ABOUT PROPOSITION 199: <br />TAXPAYER GROUPS AGREE: <br />Opponents deceptively claim "thousands of widows and other <br />seniors Will face lose of their mobilehomes." The <br />Proportion 199 doesn't take coauoi from cities and give it <br />to the <br />truth is: <br />• Proposition 199 protects seniors and low income families. <br />state, as opponents claim. It takes goveranoeat <br />mmerty pleteLy out of private propriots issues. <br />It maintains mat controls for all current tenants <br />No tenant will be evicted or forced out by Proposition 199. <br />• Preposition 199 eliminates several million per year in <br />layer -ceded buresaejacy. <br />PROPOSITION 199 PROTECTS LOW-INCOME i'ENAN'TS: <br />PAUL GAriNS CITIZENS COMMITTEE fSPIRIT OF <br />• Proposition 199 mattes a 1.0% rent rednmon available to <br />PROP. 13), CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PARK <br />approximately 100,000 law -income seniors and families <br />not now protected. <br />OWi�IERS AND CALIFORNIA MOB)EROME TENANTS <br />AS.SOCIATTON AGREE: <br />As tenants voluntarily move, Proposition 199 phases -in <br />Privately funded tent reductions and r@zUres <br />VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 199 <br />market fortes to <br />make Mobilebomee more affordable for those seeking them. <br />gDeALANAEMN <br />pseaidcre� <br />TO T'ilE G.S. CENSUS BUREAU: <br />California Alabi[el orar Tl r oats AssociationACCORDING <br />• Of 1,000,000 mobilehome tenants is California, only 30% <br />are seniors, Of these, SO% own their homes <br />&QCk tAL stlT1Z$g <br />Nt Unitrd Seniary Aasoeiation <br />outright with <br />no mmmesge. <br />LEWIS X UW.EB <br />^-rxidkPL4 Caufb►ma 2kw Lilmiead m Committee <br />P96 Argumenta printed ea this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by spy official agevvrr. 39 <br />JAN-10-199G 14:43 <br />44 97% p.05 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.