My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
13A Action Items
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 07182022
>
13A Action Items
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 2:27:10 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 11:13:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
7/18/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
MO 2022-014 Submit 2023-2031 Public Review Draft Housing Element - Copy
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
500
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />2023-2031 Housing Element Update <br /> <br />2-42 <br />Acquisition/Rehabilitation <br />If this property was 100 percent deed restricted affordable housing with an expiring regulatory <br />agreement, transferring ownership of an at-risk project to a non-profit housing provider is one of <br />the least costly ways to ensure that the at-risk units remain affordable for the long term. By <br />transferring property ownership to a non-profit organization, low-income restrictions can be <br />secured, and the project would become potentially eligible for a greater range of governmental <br />subsidies. <br />Under AB 1521 noted above, there are now proscribed steps for owners of deed restricted <br />properties to take prior to the expiration of those affordability requirements. This law requires that <br />the owner consider an offer to purchase the deed-restricted units. Since only a portion of the <br />property has deed-restricted units, it is unclear how a transaction like this could occur. Also, the <br />feasibility of this option depends on funding sources to buy and potentially rehabilitate the property <br />which might be challenging since it is not a 100 percent deed restricted property. <br />Another option to preserve the affordability of this at-risk project is to support a Joint Power <br />Authorities purchase of the property. If this option is exercised, it would require deed restrictions <br />for 100 percent of the residential units but also allows for bond financing that would allow the <br />owner to maintain the project as affordable housing. City staff are currently participating in an <br />Alameda County-wide working group to identify joint powers agreement terms and conditions that <br />would ensure meaningful long-term affordability if this path was pursued. <br />Construction of Replacement Units <br />To understand the significance if these at-risk units are lost from the supply of city affordable <br />housing, the City has prepared a hypothetical analysis that identifies the cost of construction of new <br />regulated housing to replace these at-risk units if they are converted to market-rate units. The cost <br />of developing housing depends upon a variety of factors, including density, size of the units (i.e., <br />square footage and number of bedrooms), location, land costs, and type of construction, as <br />discussed in the Non-governmental Constraints section of Chapter 3, Housing Constraints. According <br />to the 2019 TCAC staff reports, the typical cost of construction for below market rate housing in <br />Alameda County in 2019 was $726,469 per unit. The total cost to replace the 35 at-risk affordable <br />units with new construction would be approximately $25.4 million. <br />Rental Subsidies <br />The City does not have a rental subsidy program and the property at risk is not currently a property <br />with a contract for tenant subsidies with HUD or the Housing Authority of the County of Alameda. <br />Therefore, rental subsidy is not an option for these units at risk of expiration. <br />Cost Comparison <br />The above analysis attempts to estimate the cost of preserving the at-risk units under various <br />options. However, because different projects have different circumstances and therefore different <br />options available, a direct comparison would not be appropriate. In general, providing additional <br />incentives/subsidies to extend the affordability covenant would require the least funding over the <br />long run, whereas the construction of new units would be the costliest option. Unfortunately, <br />providing rent subsidies would be less costly, but this option is not available as the City does not <br />operate such a program.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.