My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1996-051 to 1996-055
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1996
>
MO 1996-051 to 1996-055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 11:27:28 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 11:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1996
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because of the nature of the problem, the staff referred the matter to the <br />Planning Commission so that it could make findings and a recommendation for <br />action by the City Council, pursuant to San Leandro Zoning Code Section 5-2906, <br />Subsection (A) of Section 5-2906 states: <br />Upon determination by the Zoning Enforcement Official that there are <br />reasonable grounds for revocation of a use permit, variance, <br />development plan approval, or other discretionary approval authorized <br />by this Code, a revocation hearing shall be set by the Zoning <br />Enforcement Official before the Board of Zoning Adjustment, the Site <br />Development Sub -Commission, the Planning Commission or the City <br />Council, whichever took final previous action on the permit, except for <br />appeals. The person or body that conducts the hearing allowed by <br />Section 5-2906 A, may revoke the permit at issue upon making one or <br />more of the following findings: <br />1. That the permit was issued on the basis of erroneous or misleading <br />information or misrepresentation; <br />2. That the terms or conditions of approval of the permit have been <br />violated or that other laws or regulations have been violated; <br />3. That there has been a discontinuance of the exercise of the entitlement <br />granted by the permit for 180 days; <br />4. That the approval has been so exercised to constitute a public nuisance <br />or be detrimental to public health and safety. <br />The Planning Commission's Staff Report, dated July 5, 1996, states: <br />The current Traffic Engineer concurs with the conclusions reached in a <br />1977 report by the traffic Engineer that because of the high volume of traffic on <br />Washington Avenue, the Harold Avenue exit provides a much safer means of <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.