Laserfiche WebLink
in water, contributing to the low mobility of contaminants in surface water and in <br />groundwater. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has concurred with <br />this finding. Therefore, the potential for contamination of surface water and <br />groundwater in the adjacent wetlands is low and no significant effects are expected. <br />Also, the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (RMI, 1995) outlines additional contaminant <br />testing during the construction of channel alignments, as well as soil sampling, chemical <br />testing of samples, and monitoring the biological diversity of the restored marsh for at <br />least a five-year period after construction. <br />A.3 POTENTIAL IMPACT: Potentially significant impacts to water quality <br />from sedimentation could result during construction. <br />FINDING: Measures described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Section <br />404 permit and in the GDP EIR (Measure 3.2.2) are incorporated in the project and will <br />reduce this potential impact to less than significant. <br />STATEMENT OF FACTS: Construction activities could result in increased <br />erosion, resulting in sediment accumulation and impacts on water quality. Several <br />measures described in the U.S. Army Corps permit and the GDP EIR (Measure 3.2.2) <br />are required to reduce erosion and sedimentation during construction. These measures <br />limit construction to the dry season, require revegetation prior to the rainy season, <br />require silt fences and other erosion control measures, restrict stockpiling, require the <br />establishment of exclusion areas and include on -site inspections. <br />B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />B.1 POTENTIAL IMPACT: Approximately 13.2 acres of low and moderate <br />value wetlands would be filled by PDP implementation for Phases 2A, 2B, and 3. <br />FINDING: A comprehensive wetland enhancement and restoration plan has <br />been approved by the Corps of Engineers and incorporated into the project which <br />substantially lessens the potential significant environmental effect of displaced wetlands. <br />STATEMENT OF FACTS: Approximately 13.2 acres of Corps jurisdictional <br />wetland and potential salt marsh harvest mouse habitat would be lost as a result of <br />development of Phases 2A, 2B and 3. The Corps has accepted as mitigation for the <br />loss of these wetlands, the restoration and enhancement of 132 acres of disturbed upland <br />and seasonal and diked salt marsh wetlands. Of the 132 acres slated for wetland <br />mitigation, 16 acres of upland or disturbed areas would be restored to salt marsh <br />habitat; thus, the PDP conforms with "S" Overlay Criterion Number 1, along with <br />Corps of Engineers regulatory requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. <br />The 1995 RMI Mitigation and Monitoring Plan outlines the objectives, implementation, <br />performance criteria and monitoring efforts for this restoration. The GDP EIR <br />(Mitigation Measure 3.3.2) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit require the <br />implementation of the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan as a special condition of <br />4 <br />