Laserfiche WebLink
2. SCOPE OF WORK <br />• Unavoidable Significant Adverse Impacts; <br />• Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes; <br />• Growth -Inducing Impacts; and <br />• Effects Found Not to Be Significant. <br />Report Preparation <br />This section will identify the report preparers and the agencies and persons <br />consulted in preparing the EIR. <br />Appendices <br />The Appendices will include the Notice of Preparation and appropriate <br />technical material. If appropriate, information such as transportation <br />calculations and technical memoranda may be included as EIR appendices. <br />C. TECHNICAL ISSUES AND TASKS <br />Our understanding of the project, discussed in Section 1 of this proposal, <br />forms the basis of our approach to the EIR, and the background for the <br />detailed scope of work that forms the remainder of this section. <br />1. Geology and Grading <br />Issues <br />The principal geotechnical issues related to the project are grading, slope <br />stability, soil erosion and earthquake hazards. The site is subject to hazards <br />of both large and minor landslides, as well as creep and other forms of soil <br />mass wasting that could damage proposed features of the development and <br />lead to off -site impacts. Residential and other forms of development under <br />the plan would expose a substantial number of people to significant <br />earthquake hazards as a segment of the Hayward Fault is located within <br />approximately 500 feet of the proposed development. Additionally, <br />damages and injuries resulting from a major earthquake may surpass the <br />ability of local emergency service providers to provide needed services. <br />A geotechnical study has been submitted by the applicant, which <br />supplements previous environmental documentation. Previous EIRs <br />prepared for the site summarize information about geologic materials, <br />geotechnical constraints and soils; much of this information can be reviewed <br />and, as applicable, be referenced in the current CEQA document. ESA <br />recognizes, however, that it would be useful to the decision -makers and <br />concerned public to have a comprehensive presentation of the geologic and <br />earthquake hazard issues evaluation in the EIR rather than depending on a <br />cumbersome cross-referencing to multiple earlier documents. The current <br />10 of 37 <br />Boulders Residential Development EIR <br />