My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 1997-101 to 105
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1997
>
Reso 1997-101 to 105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 4:45:39 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 4:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
12/31/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the lack of truly comparable sales and the numerous adjustments that would have to be made to <br />recent sales, primary reliance is establishing the reuse value has been placed on the use of the income <br />approach to value. <br />The income approach is based upon the income and cost characteristics of the proposed project. For <br />the purpose of determining the reuse value of the land, the residual value can be defined as the <br />difference between the development cost of the project, excluding land, and the total amount the <br />developer (or investor) can afford to invest. The amount the developer can afford is based upon the <br />projected net operating income revenue generated by the project, the present and anticipated money <br />market conditions which impact the cost to finance the project, and the required rate of return on the <br />investment warranted. <br />The economics of the proposed Project must be determined on the basis of the costs and revenues <br />generated by the Project as a whole. This section of the report presents the estimates of the <br />development costs and revenues for each of the uses and the assumptions made to determine these <br />estimates. <br />A. Development Costs <br />Development cost estimates are based on information provided by the proposed Developer, <br />Creekside Center Associates, Inc. These estimates were examined for reasonableness by Agency <br />staffand Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. The cost estimates appear to be reasonable for the quality <br />of project required by the Agency. However, KMA has not conducted an independent evaluation of <br />the construction costs. <br />Overall, it is important to note that, per the Agreement, the Developer is responsible for designing <br />and developing a high quality retail center with architectural and site upgrades of higher quality than <br />would typically be found in a neighborhood shopping center. The estimated development costs <br />reflect the costs to meet these requirements. <br />Table 1 presents the estimated direct and indirect development costs for the proposed Project. These <br />components are to be financed and owned by the Developer. As shown in Table 1, the total <br />development costs, before land, are estimated at $9.3 million, or $115 per square foot of rentable <br />building area. The major assumptions behind the development cost estimate are as follows: <br />The retail shell cost, inclusive of tenant improvements, is estimated to average $66.80 <br />per sq. ft. of rentable area for the 80,500 sq.ft. of rentable retail space. The retail shell <br />costs reflected are higher than typical for a neighborhood shopping center. <br />190 <br />KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES I N C. <br />Page 10 <br />19100J0001-=.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.