Reso 1997-136 to 140 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

During the continuance period, Councilmember Polvorosa, the City Manager and staff continued to work with the involved parties. Following is a summary of the negotiation process during this period: • On November 26, 1996, Councilmember Polvorosa and staff met with Mr. Sullivan. A compromise was proposed and Mr. Sullivan agreed to review the proposal with his tenants. • In a letter dated December 4, 1996, Mr. Sullivan submitted a proposal to close the vehicle and pedestrian gate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. • On December 12, 1996, Councilmember Polvorosa and staff met with representatives of Harold Avenue to review Mr. Sullivan's proposal. • In a letter dated December 17, 1996, the Harold Avenue residents indicated that they could not accept the proposal because it did not place enough limitation on the pedestrian gate. The neighbors indicated that they were willing to consider another compromise which closed the pedestrian gate or made it exit only. • The Harold Avenue neighbors met again without staff and developed another proposal which was submitted in writing on January 13, 1997. That letter put forth two proposals. One closed the vehicle and pedestrian gate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. The other proposal closed the vehicle and pedestrian gate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. and made gate exit only. • On January 29, 1997, Councilmember Polvorosa and staff met with Mr. Sullivan to review the latest proposal. • In a letter dated February 10, 1997, Mr. Sullivan indicated that he had reviewed the proposals with his tenants. The letter indicated that the tenants would not accept either of the latest G:UOANNVSMORnYWSFINDG.CC