Laserfiche WebLink
a. any alternative proposal will work and this is verified by an independent <br />traffic engineering analysis; <br />b. there would be no increased costs to AC Transit and other transit providers <br />who use the Transbay Transit Terminal (either because there are no cost <br />impacts or funding is provided for such additional costs, both now and in the <br />future); <br />C. there will be no deterioration of bus service from the riders' perspective (i.e., <br />on -time performance, trip duration, loading and unloading convenience); <br />d. any alternative will not increase the potential for additional traffic congestion <br />on the Bay Bridge or on the streets of the City of San Francisco from buses <br />servicing the Terminal; <br />e. the proposal does not favor private automobiles over public transportation; <br />and <br />f. an environmental analysis consistent with the California Environmental <br />Quality Act and its Guidelines is undertaken in advance of any policy action. <br />SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and <br />adoption. <br />Introduced by Council Member Pol vorosa and passed and adopted <br />this 15th day of June, 1998, by the following called vote. <br />Members of the Council: <br />AYES: Council Members Galvan, Glaze, Lothrop, Polvorosa, Young; <br />Mayor Corbett ( 6 ) <br />NOES: None ( 0 ) <br />ABSENT: Council Member Loeffler ( 1 ) <br />Attest: � �- <br />Gayie P ersen, City Clerk <br />Ii <br />