My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
ShorelineMarina Highlights 2009 0121, 0225, 0318 & 0415
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Shoreline-Marina Committee
>
ShorelineMarina Highlights 2009 0121, 0225, 0318 & 0415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2022 2:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/29/2022 2:28:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
12/31/2009
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Shoreline CAC <br />March 18, 2009 <br />Meeting Highlights <br />Page 12 <br />• Waterfront development is a major undertaking, with various factors, pieces <br />and processes (constraints). <br />• The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process is very involved <br />and would ensure environmental factors are considered for the proposed <br />master plan. The CEQA process could take one year for public review and <br />consideration for approval. <br />• There are many regulatory agencies that would be involved with the future <br />master plan of the Shoreline area such as the Bay Conservation and <br />Development Commission (BCDC), U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE), <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service, and the California Department of Fish and Game, to name a few. <br />• Constraints were summarized to include: General Plan and Zoning Code <br />amendments, biological resources, geology and soils, hazardous materials, <br />hydrology and water quality, transportation and circulation, noise, air quality, <br />public services, utilities and recreation. <br />• After taking into consideration all of these listed constraints, the developer <br />will hope that there are no "fatal flaws" (i.e., significant environmental impact <br />with cost prohibitive mitigation measures) that are identified to block the <br />project. <br />• The most important constraints that could limit the feasibility of the project <br />are the land use issues relating to the General Plan and Zoning Code, traffic <br />and circulation, biological resources, wetlands and air quality. <br />• The degree of impacts depends on the types and density of the specific <br />projects that are proposed. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the following: <br />• How many pages would it take to cover environmental documentation for a <br />shoreline master plan? An estimate would be 200 to 300 pages. <br />• What is the ACOE and the RWQCB's role in project review? Any <br />development projects along the Bay with five or more acres are subject to <br />their review of Storm Water Run-off Management and Best Practices. <br />• It was mentioned that Loch Lomond Marina in San Rafael has an entitled <br />residential townhouse component for approximately 85 units. Construction of <br />the project is delayed due to the current and poor economic conditions. <br />• Palo Alto closed its marina 20 years due to its maintenance and dredging <br />costs. <br />• Future development needs to consider its proximity to the airport. Special <br />noise insulation will be required as a mitigation measure for future <br />development. Five- to six —stories would likely be the maximum height <br />permitted due to the airplane flight paths. 58 feet was the maximum height at <br />the elbow -shaped part of the shoreline area and up to 80 feet along the <br />easterly edge of the golf course. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.