My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2006 0301
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2006 0301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2022 2:44:19 PM
Creation date
8/2/2022 2:42:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
3/1/2006
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Baloca further explained that the one-time repayment of the City's 03-04 VLF loan to the State will be <br />placed in reserves to offset last years 2004-05 $1.9 million deficit and extend the time that reserves can <br />be drawn upon. <br />With future sales tax and interest rate revenues unclear, Mayor Young suggested that the $575K Kaiser <br />transfer tax be redirected to reserves. Stephens verified that the $1.38 million vehicle license fee money <br />and Kaiser $575K transfer tax are one-time receipts <br />Jermanis pointed out that this is the last year that the City will contribute $1.2 million to the State as a <br />result of Proposition IA. <br />Starosciak questioned the increase of overtime for fire services, since their annual budget was increased <br />by another $600K. Her recollection was that the budget increase was to include additional people and <br />eventually reduce the amount of overtime. Both Young and Starosciak requested a clear understanding of <br />what mandatory overtime entails. Hollister was asked to verify why the City has to pay additional <br />overtime and if it can be automatically added to the Alameda County Fire contract. <br />. 2. Discussion Regarding 2005-06 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments <br />Rodriguez explained staff s recommendation to formally approve the mid -year budget amendments, <br />which include all adjustments made after the 2005-06 budget was originally adopted in June 2005. <br />The following schedules where brought forward for review: <br />Schedule A: Summary of year-end budget adjustments by fund. <br />Schedule B: Detail expenditures and revenue adjustments and specific funding sources. <br />Schedule C: Summary of revenues and expenditures by fund after the City's mid -year budget review. <br />Jermanis suggested finding a way to automatically increase the carryover revenues along with the <br />matching expenditures for the new fiscal year for all projects and grants, which will reduce Council's <br />need to review previously approved items. Jermanis also reported that the City is now responsible for <br />recording the financial transactions of the LINKS program. <br />3. Discussion Regarding Investment Report <br />Finance Director Baloca reported on the performance of the City's investments as of December 31, 2005. <br />The City's investment portfolio had a market value of $48.4 million, an increase of $320K from <br />September 30, 2005. The City's LAIF investments account for 18.2% of the City's total investments. <br />The investment portfolio managed by Chandler Investments had a December 31, 2005 average book <br />yield of 3.40%, an increase from 3.28% on September 30, 2005. The average maturity of investments <br />with Chandler are 2 1/2 years with a maximum maturity of 5 years. Baloca reported the recent change in <br />strategy to reinvest back into LAIF (shorter -term investment) as Chandler investments mature. The <br />change in investment strategy reflects the current Treasury rate environment where shorter -terms yield <br />are exceeding longer -term rates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.