Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />zo <br />zl <br />zz <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />Afar";''' M. CARDEN <br />4TTOgNEY AT LAW <br />M0 EAST 14TH STREET <br />SAN LEANDRO, CALIF. <br />allegations of the complaint are true and that all the allogations <br />contained in the answer are untrue; <br />And it further appearing that at all times mentioned in the <br />complaint Donald R. Ingraham and Berenice A. Ingraham, his wife, <br />were, and na:a are the oviners and in possession of the parcel of <br />land described in the complaint and sou-ht to be eond©mned in <br />this action and of the larger parcel of land of which the same <br />forms a part; that at all times mentioned in the complaint there <br />sere, and now are valid and subsisting liens upon said land by <br />virtue of those two certain deeds of trust as follmm: <br />The first of said deeds of trust is dated April 1, 1929, and <br />recorded April 50 1929 in .iaiber 2064 of Official Records, pape 379, <br />wherein Donald R, Ingraham, and Berenice , Ingraham, his wife, are <br />grantors, Oahland Title Insurance and Guaranty Company, a corpora- <br />tion is trusteo, and U. Dutot and Lena Dutot, his vife, are bene- <br />ficiarica, <br />The second of said deems of trust is dated Aft Wt 13, 1932, <br />and recorded August 22, 1932 in Lib6r 2869 of Official Records, <br />page 719 -dierein Donald R. Ingraham and Berenice A. Ingraham, is <br />Wife are grantors, Alameda County T itle Inmxcance Company, a <br />corporation, is trustee, and H. Dutot and Lena Dutot, his wife, <br />are beneficiaries; <br />That said H. Dutot and Lena Dutot, his wife, ever sim a have <br />been, and iiow are the 0�,nors of the notes secured by thy% aforesaid <br />deeds of trust; <br />And it further app ear i ng that the ac to al value and fair <br />market value of the land described in the complaint and souht to <br />be condemned herein was, at the date of the trial hereof, the pum <br />of 6400,00; that the damages which will accrue to the remaining <br />portion of said larger parcel not (:ought to be condemned hii:re in, <br />by reason of its severance from the portion sought to be condemned <br />was, at the date of the trial hereof, the sum of v280.00, <br />And it further appt�arin- that the public interest and neees- <br />-2- <br />