Laserfiche WebLink
-y ,ITY OF SAN LEAND2R" <br />r r INTEROFFICE MEMO <br />1 <br />�a�MY <br />TO G. Homer Hamlin, Public Works Director DATE August 22, 1961 <br />cc: W. Mct'Fure, City Kanager <br />FROM Arthur M. Carden, City Attorney <br />SUBJECT Pe: Annexation of Eden Road - Your memo 8/4/61 -- Our No. a-1944 <br />Just prior to March 8, 1961, 1 carefully reviewed the files on the above annexation. On <br />2 that date the City Manager, the Public Works Director, and I discussed the matter at Ien th. <br />s My notes show that the followinq were outlined; <br />4 (a) Pelkey and Rich requested the Public Works Director to take necessary steps for <br />5 annexation of certain properties, not described, to the City of San Leandro. Since these <br />6 requests were not used within six months of their date they are now void. <br />7 (b) Prior to that time I had prepared a petition for the annexation of the entire area <br />a in question. This petition has disappeared. I have, therefore, prepared new papers covering <br />9 the annexation. These include a request for detachment of the same territory from the City of <br />I <br />io Oakland and the consent of the freeholders to such detachment. This consent must be signed by <br />ii at least two-thirds of the freeholders within the territory holding at least two-thirds in <br />12 value of the real property in the territory. <br />is A petition for annexation has also been prepared which should be signed by the owners of <br />14 not less than one-fourth of the area of the land in such territory representing not less than i <br />15 one-fourth of the assessed value of such territory according to the last preceding equalized <br />16 assessment roll of Alameda County in which such territory is situated The signatures of all <br />17 owners that it is possible to obtain should be obtained <br />78 After these Rapers are signed they Should not be filed until all concerned have had a on- <br />19 ference and a schedule of timing has been worked out <br />20 The City of Oakland (not the Port of Oakland) is the real party in interest and negotia- <br />21 tions should be had with the City Council or its staff to ascertain whether or not the City of <br />22 Oakland will agree; otherwise, all effort spent in this long prolonged matter has been a <br />23 complete waste of tirie and eneray. <br />24 "w /I (_27 .GC.Niyja ) <br />Arthur M. Carden <br />25 AMC:aw City Attorney <br />0 <br />