My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Annexation - Nimitz Fwy Annex , Acres, Ord 66-148, 05-17-1965
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Recorded Documents
>
Annexations
>
Annexation - Nimitz Fwy Annex , Acres, Ord 66-148, 05-17-1965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2022 6:03:58 PM
Creation date
10/26/2022 5:57:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Recorded Document Type
Annexation
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SAN LEANDR(% C-2636 <br />INTEROFFICE MEMO <br />To <br />FROM <br />G. Homer Hamlin, <br />Arthur M. <br />Carden <br />Pub Works Dir. <br />City Attorney_ <br />DATE January <br />13, 1964 <br />Your memo <br />SUBJECT and Nimitz <br />1/7/64 <br />Freeway <br />regarding annexation of streets in the vicinity of <br />(Relinquishment No. 22034) <br />Washington Avenue <br />1 <br />On August <br />1 1963 <br />1 answered your memo of 7-19-63 <br />(R. H. Ward) regarding <br />the <br />2 <br />relinquishment <br />by the <br />State of certain areas which <br />had theretofore constituted <br />a part <br />a <br />of the freeway. <br />An annexation of this type is effected by the Board of <br />Supervisors. <br />4 <br />1 discussed this <br />matter <br />with Ccyt, Deputy District <br />Attorney, prior to my <br />memo. This <br />5 morning I again called Coyt, who advises me that the Board of Supervisors have in process <br />6 now certain annexations of this type, but he is uncertain as to whether such annexations <br />7 are to Hayward or to San Leandro. Has anyone from the City of San Leandro contacted the <br />8 Board of Supervisors regarding these annexations? <br />9 If not, I would suggest that the matter be presented to the City Council which would <br />10 then adopt a resolution requesting the Board of Supervisorsto effect this annexation. <br />11 Without checking in detail, I appear to have two files on this matter containing descriptions <br />12 of the same properties. These cover: <br />13 LD-63-29 Parcel I <br />14 LD-63-29 Parcel 2 <br />15 LD-63-29 Parcel <br />16 \ LD-63-29 Parcel 4 <br />17 It would, therefore, appear that I have a surplus of material now. <br />18 <br />Arthur M. Carden <br />20 AMC:nf City Attorney <br />21j '7 <br />22 IX/� �� / >1(l <br />23 ��l�il ��: o—� �� ✓� <br />v <br />24 <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.