My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11F Consent
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2023
>
Packet 20230515
>
11F Consent
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:23:58 AM
Creation date
5/31/2023 12:02:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/15/2023
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 23-051 City's Gas Tax Fund
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
File Number: 23-183 <br />New Gas Tax <br />Transportation Improvement Fee <br />Portion of Diesel Excise Tax <br />Fifty percent (50%) of the revenue goes to the state, and 50% to local jurisdictions, with the local share <br />split evenly between cities and counties. City revenues are allocated per capita; County revenues are <br />allocated 75% by registered vehicles, and 25% by road mileage. <br />Eligible projects “shall be prioritized for expenditure on basic road maintenance and road rehabilitation <br />projects, and on critical safety projects.”(Streets and Highways Code Section 2030(a).) There is no <br />use-it-or-lose-it requirement in SB 1, so multi-year projects are eligible. <br /> Eligible projects include, but are not limited to: <br />Road maintenance and rehabilitation; <br />Safety projects; <br />Railroad grade separations; <br />Complete streets components, including active transportation, bike/ped, transit facilities, and stormwater <br />capture projects; <br />Traffic control devices; and <br />Match for state/federal funds for eligible projects. <br />Per implementation guidelines, basic maintenance and safety projects should be prioritized, and to the <br />extent possible, include complete streets components and advanced technologies. <br />Prior to receiving funds, local agencies must annually submit a list of projects proposed to be funded <br />with RMRA funds to the CTC. Although the CTC is not an “approving” body, project lists will be reviewed <br />to ensure that they include statutorily required information to establish eligibility for funding. Failure to <br />submit a project list to the CTC and establish annual eligibility will result in forfeiture of monthly <br />apportionments. Currently, there is no process to recoup lost apportionments, which would be distributed <br />to eligible agencies. <br />SB 1 requires that the project list include four components: <br />Project Description; <br />The location of each proposed project (“citywide” is not an option); <br />Schedule for completion; and <br />Estimated useful life of improvement. <br />California Streets and Highways Code Section 2034(a)(1) stipulates that the list must be pursuant to an <br />adopted budget (or budget amendment), approved at a public meeting, and that all projects proposed to <br />receive funding shall be included in the City’s budget. <br />The list cannot limit flexible use of funds, provided that funds are only used for eligible projects, meaning <br />that a city can fund projects in a given year not on the project list, or not fund projects that were on the <br />project list. At the end of the fiscal year, the City must report back to the CTC on the locations of work <br />performed. Per established guidelines, any listed projects not started/completed can be moved to next <br />year’s list. Changes to the list do not require going back to the CTC for an amendment. <br />To receive RMRA funding, a city or county must annually expend from its general fund for street, road, <br />and highway purposes an amount not less than the annual average of its expenditures from its General <br />Fund during Fiscal Years 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 (Streets and Highways Code Section <br />2036(b)). This is referred to as the ‘Maintenance of Effort’, or MOE. If a city or county fails to meet the <br />MOE in a fiscal year, it can be made up in the following fiscal year. The CTC can audit to determine that <br />the MOE was met, and non-compliant agencies may have to reimburse the state. <br />Included in the MOE are unrestricted, discretionary funds including vehicle in-lieu tax revenues and <br />revenues from fines and forfeitures that are expended for street, road, and highway purposes. One-time <br />allocations expended for street and highway purposes, but which may not be available on an ongoing <br />basis, including revenue provided under the Teeter Plan Bond Law of 1994, are excluded. Additionally, <br />HUTA funds are not part of the MOE calculation. <br />Projects performed in San Leandro by Public Works staff are coordinated with the Engineering & <br />Transportation Department to ensure that any required ADA ramp work is coordinated (to the extent <br />feasible). <br />Page 2 City of San Leandro Printed on 5/10/2023
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.