My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
13A ACTION
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2023
>
Packet 20230605
>
13A ACTION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2024 5:52:44 PM
Creation date
6/8/2023 3:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/5/2023
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
File Number: 23-266 <br />incorporated cities like San Leandro. <br />Additional services provided by the City are available to tenants facing eviction. The City has <br />contracted annually with the nonprofit Centro Legal de la Raza since July 2020 to administer the <br />City’s Tenant-Landlord Counseling Program, which includes legal services for low-income renter <br />households. Centro Legal subcontracts annually with ECHO Housing, a non-profit organization, to <br />administer Tenant-Landlord Counseling, while Centro Legal administers legal consultation and <br />services. <br />Environmental Review <br />The proposed Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality <br />Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen <br />with certainty that there is no possibility that the action may have a significant effect on the <br />environment. <br />Legal Analysis <br />The February 14 staff report for the introduction of Ordinance No. 2023-001 contains a detailed <br />legal analysis of the City’s eviction moratorium. While no Council legislative action can be <br />completely immune from legal challenge, based on the Northern District’s recent decision in <br />Williams v. Alameda County (N.D. Cal., Nov. 22, 2022) 2022 WL 17169833 (Williams), where <br />plaintiffs contested Alameda County’s and the City of Oakland’s eviction moratoria, both of which <br />extend past the expiration of the Governor’s state of emergency, the City has strong arguments <br />that its extension of the eviction moratorium will withstand a facial challenge. <br />The existing eviction moratorium does not violate State law because it is temporary in nature, it <br />does not relieve tenants of their contractual obligations to pay back rent, eviction restrictions are <br />limited to non-payment of rent, the ordinance’s protections apply to tenants only, and it includes <br />exceptions allowing a landlord to leave the rental business (i.e. exercising an Ellis Act eviction). <br />The eviction moratorium similarly does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Contracts Clause <br />because the elimination of the eviction remedy does not extinguish landlords’ contractual rights <br />such that tenants may be evicted for breach of contract. It does not violate due process and equal <br />protection under the Fourteenth Amendment because landlords are not denied a hearing or <br />prevented from litigation; the ordinance allows tenants to raise a defense in an eviction <br />proceeding. <br />By ending the eviction moratorium effective July 31, 2023, the City will strengthen the argument <br />that the eviction moratorium was temporary in nature, designed to address specific public welfare <br />concerns, and terminated as soon as circumstances warranted. <br />ATTACHMENT <br />Page 3 City of San Leandro Printed on 5/31/2023
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.