|
Environmental Checklist
<br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions
<br />
<br />Draft Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 71
<br />(CARB 2009). Many of the GHG reduction measures included in the Scoping Plan (e.g., Low Carbon
<br />Fuel Standard, Advanced Clean Car standards, and Cap-and-Trade) have been adopted since the
<br />Scoping Plan’s approval.
<br />The CARB approved the 2013 Scoping Plan update in May 2014 (CARB 2014). The update defined
<br />the CARB’s climate change priorities for the next five years, set the groundwork to reach post-2020
<br />statewide goals, and highlighted California’s progress toward meeting the “near-term” 2020 GHG
<br />emission reduction goals defined in the original Scoping Plan. It also evaluated how to align the
<br />state’s longer term GHG reduction strategies with other state policy priorities, including those for
<br />water, waste, natural resources, clean energy, transportation, and land use (CARB 2014).
<br />On September 8, 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 32 into law, extending the California
<br />Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 by requiring the state to further reduce GHG emissions to
<br />40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (the other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged). On
<br />December 14, 2017, the CARB adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan, which provides a framework for
<br />achieving the 2030 target. The 2017 Scoping Plan relies on the continuation and expansion of
<br />existing policies and regulations, such as the Cap-and-Trade Program, and implementation of
<br />recently adopted policies and legislation, such as SB 1383 and SB 100 (discussed later). The 2017
<br />Scoping Plan also puts an increased emphasis on innovation, adoption of existing technology, and
<br />strategic investment to support its strategies. As with the 2013 Scoping Plan update, the 2017
<br />Scoping Plan does not provide project-level thresholds for land use development. Instead, it
<br />recommends that local governments adopt policies and locally appropriate quantitative thresholds
<br />consistent with statewide per capita goals of six MT CO2e by 2030 and two MT CO2e by 2050 (CARB
<br />2017). As stated in the 2017 Scoping Plan, these goals may be appropriate for plan-level analyses
<br />(city, county, sub-regional, or regional level), but not for specific individual projects because they
<br />include all emissions sectors in the state (CARB 2017).
<br />AB 1279, “The California Climate Crisis Act,” was passed on September 16, 2022 and declares the
<br />State would achieve net zero GHG emissions as soon as possible, but no later than 2045, and to
<br />achieve and maintain net negative GHG emissions thereafter. In addition, the bill states that the
<br />State would reduce GHG emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels no later than 2045. CARB’s
<br />2022 Scoping Plan for achieving Carbon Neutrality lays out a path to achieve AB 1279 targets and SB
<br />32 (CARB 2022). The actions and outcomes in the 2022 Scoping Plan would achieve significant
<br />reductions in fossil fuel combustion by deploying clean technologies and fuels, further reductions in
<br />short-lived climate pollutants, support for sustainable development, increased action on natural and
<br />working lands to reduce emissions and sequester carbon, and the capture and storage of carbon.
<br />City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan
<br />The City of San Leandro’s 2035 General Plan, adopted in September 2016, lists several GHG-
<br />reduction goals, policies, and actions as part of the Transportation Element and Open Space, Parks,
<br />and Conservation Element that support the goal of reducing GHG emissions. The following goals and
<br />policies are applicable to the proposed project (City of San Leandro 2016):
<br />Policy T-5.2 Evaluating Development Impacts. Use vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary
<br />metric for evaluating the transportation impacts of new development proposals.
<br />Traffic impact studies may also consider the total number of trips generated and the
<br />resulting impact on traffic volumes and congestion (e.g., “Level of Service”), but
<br />VMT shall provide the primary basis for determining appropriate mitigation
<br />measures.
|