Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> <br />Draft Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 71 <br />(CARB 2009). Many of the GHG reduction measures included in the Scoping Plan (e.g., Low Carbon <br />Fuel Standard, Advanced Clean Car standards, and Cap-and-Trade) have been adopted since the <br />Scoping Plan’s approval. <br />The CARB approved the 2013 Scoping Plan update in May 2014 (CARB 2014). The update defined <br />the CARB’s climate change priorities for the next five years, set the groundwork to reach post-2020 <br />statewide goals, and highlighted California’s progress toward meeting the “near-term” 2020 GHG <br />emission reduction goals defined in the original Scoping Plan. It also evaluated how to align the <br />state’s longer term GHG reduction strategies with other state policy priorities, including those for <br />water, waste, natural resources, clean energy, transportation, and land use (CARB 2014). <br />On September 8, 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 32 into law, extending the California <br />Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 by requiring the state to further reduce GHG emissions to <br />40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (the other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged). On <br />December 14, 2017, the CARB adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan, which provides a framework for <br />achieving the 2030 target. The 2017 Scoping Plan relies on the continuation and expansion of <br />existing policies and regulations, such as the Cap-and-Trade Program, and implementation of <br />recently adopted policies and legislation, such as SB 1383 and SB 100 (discussed later). The 2017 <br />Scoping Plan also puts an increased emphasis on innovation, adoption of existing technology, and <br />strategic investment to support its strategies. As with the 2013 Scoping Plan update, the 2017 <br />Scoping Plan does not provide project-level thresholds for land use development. Instead, it <br />recommends that local governments adopt policies and locally appropriate quantitative thresholds <br />consistent with statewide per capita goals of six MT CO2e by 2030 and two MT CO2e by 2050 (CARB <br />2017). As stated in the 2017 Scoping Plan, these goals may be appropriate for plan-level analyses <br />(city, county, sub-regional, or regional level), but not for specific individual projects because they <br />include all emissions sectors in the state (CARB 2017). <br />AB 1279, “The California Climate Crisis Act,” was passed on September 16, 2022 and declares the <br />State would achieve net zero GHG emissions as soon as possible, but no later than 2045, and to <br />achieve and maintain net negative GHG emissions thereafter. In addition, the bill states that the <br />State would reduce GHG emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels no later than 2045. CARB’s <br />2022 Scoping Plan for achieving Carbon Neutrality lays out a path to achieve AB 1279 targets and SB <br />32 (CARB 2022). The actions and outcomes in the 2022 Scoping Plan would achieve significant <br />reductions in fossil fuel combustion by deploying clean technologies and fuels, further reductions in <br />short-lived climate pollutants, support for sustainable development, increased action on natural and <br />working lands to reduce emissions and sequester carbon, and the capture and storage of carbon. <br />City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan <br />The City of San Leandro’s 2035 General Plan, adopted in September 2016, lists several GHG- <br />reduction goals, policies, and actions as part of the Transportation Element and Open Space, Parks, <br />and Conservation Element that support the goal of reducing GHG emissions. The following goals and <br />policies are applicable to the proposed project (City of San Leandro 2016): <br />Policy T-5.2 Evaluating Development Impacts. Use vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary <br />metric for evaluating the transportation impacts of new development proposals. <br />Traffic impact studies may also consider the total number of trips generated and the <br />resulting impact on traffic volumes and congestion (e.g., “Level of Service”), but <br />VMT shall provide the primary basis for determining appropriate mitigation <br />measures.