My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250121
>
8A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2025 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 3:58:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
1/21/2025
Retention
Perm
Document Relationships
Reso 2025-008 Rejecting Appeal (PLN24-0040)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />January 5, 2025 <br />By Electronic Mail <br />To: Mayor Juan González III, Vice Mayor Fred Simon, Councilmember Victor Aguilar, <br />Jr.,Councilmember Bryan Azevedo, Councilmember Dylan Boldt, Councilmember Xouhoa <br />Bowen and Councilmember Sbeydeh Viveros-Walton (CityCouncil@sanleandro.org) <br />From: Ariel Strauss, Of-Counsel, Greenfire Law, P.C., on behalf of Wayne Daniel Russo, Jr. <br />Subject: Letter Detailing Basis to Deny a CUP for 80-Foot Macro Tower on 440 Peralta Ave. <br />(Agenda Item 8a) <br />Dear Honorable Mayor González, Vice Mayor Simon and Councilmembers Aguilar, Azevedo, <br />Boldt, Bowen and Viveros-Walton: <br />Through Greenfire Law, P.C., I am legal counsel to Wayne Daniel Russo, Jr., the owner of 523 <br />San Leandro Blvd., in connection with appeal of the Conditional Use Permit (PLN23-0031) for a <br />new 80-foot AT&T Wireless Telecommunications Facility applied for by Tower Engineering <br />Professionals (the Applicant) for 440 Peralta Ave. My practice specializes in land use and <br />telecommunications law. I am writing to request that the City uphold the appeal and deny the CUP <br />because the tower as proposed is inconsistent with the City’s General Plan and federal law does <br />not obligate the City to approve the facility. <br />Mr. Russo’s appeal raised the following objections in his notice of appeal: <br />1)Denial of due process due to failure to receive notice of the Planning Commission <br />hearing. <br />2)Allowing the propagation of radiofrequency emissions (RF) in excess of the human <br />exposure limits set by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) at the altitude of <br />intended residential development is unacceptable from a public health standpoint, deter <br />potential residents, reduce property values and interferes with the City’s housing <br />objectives. <br />Ariel Strauss, Of-Counsel <br />2001 Addison Street, Suite 300 <br />Berkeley, CA 94704 <br />Phone: (510) 900-9502 x 702 <br />Email: astrauss@greenfirelaw.com <br />www.greenfirelaw.com <br />Att B - Page 21 of 46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.