My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8B Public
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250505
>
8B Public
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 9:28:03 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 10:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
5/5/2025
Retention
Perm
Document Relationships
Reso 2025-042 Rejecting Appeal (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Reso 2025-043 Certifying EIR (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5995
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
File Number: 25-134 <br />Draft and Final EIR have adequately evaluated and addressed the subject matter. Staff believes <br />the environmental documentation provides adequate analysis to support City Council adoption of <br />the CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations . <br />The EIR identified significant, unavoidable adverse impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, due <br />to the BAAQMD having classified all projects that use or might use natural gas as having a <br />significant climate impact. Due to a recent lawsuit, California Restaurant Association v City of <br />Berkeley, cities may not ban the use of natural gas. Because the applicant wants to have the <br />flexibility to offer natural gas to potential tenants, the project is proposing to be plumbed for gas. <br />However, all lighting, heating, air conditioning, and appliances would use electricity; gas would <br />only be used for necessary industrial processes, if at all. <br />The CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, Attachment C to Attachment <br />A, summarizes each impact, any mitigation measures and the feasibility of mitigation, and <br />residual impacts after mitigation for each impact category in the EIR and alternatives to the <br />project and establishes the benefits of the project to the City of San Leandro and the reasons for <br />approving the project in spite of some impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level of <br />insignificance.. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />To approve the proposed Administrative Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and <br />Administrative Exception (Height), the City Council must make certain findings of facts pursuant <br />to the Zoning Code. Staff has analyzed the proposal and determined that the required findings <br />can be made, as documented in Attachment I - Findings of Fact. <br />PUBLIC OUTREACH <br /> <br />A notice of public hearing was published for this project in the East Bay Times Daily Review <br />newspaper on April 25, 2025, at City Hall, on the property, and by mail to property owners within <br />500 feet of the subject property. <br /> <br /> <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br />A. Resolution No. 2025-XXX Certifying EIR <br />Attachment A, Exhibit A: Draft Environmental Impact Report <br />Attachment A, Exhibit B: Final Environmental Impact Report <br />Attachment A, Exhibit C: CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding <br />Considerations <br />Attachment A, Exhibit D: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program <br />B: Resolution No. 2025-XXX Rejecting the Appeal (APL25-0001) and Approving PLN22- <br />0039 <br />Attachment B, Exhibit A: Project Plans <br />C:Appeals of the Planning Commission’s Decision <br />Page 5 City of San Leandro Printed on 9/4/2025
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.