Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City of San Leandro Page 2-1 <br />Parks Development Impact Fee Study <br />May 14, 2025 <br />This chapter presents data on existing and future development that will be used to calculate impact <br />fees in subsequent chapters of this report. The information in this chapter may be used to establish <br />levels of service, analyze facility needs, and allocate the cost of capital facilities among various types <br />of development. <br />Development data presented in this chapter are based on information from the City of San Leandro <br />Community Development Department, the U.S. Census Bureau and the American Community Survey <br />(ACS), the California Department of Finance (DOF) Demographic Research Unit, and other sources <br />as noted in this chapter. <br />Study Area and Time Frame <br />The study area for this study is the City of San Leandro. The timeframe for this study extends from <br />the present time to 2035. Although the future development projected in this chapter is expected to <br />occur by 2035, the actual timing of development cannot be predicted with certainty. The impact fee <br />calculations in this report do not depend on when future development occurs. <br />Development Types <br />The impact fees calculated in this report will be applied only to residential development. The <br />residential development types defined in this study are listed below. Traditionally, impact fees for <br />residential development are based on the type of unit, e.g., single-family, multi-family or mobile <br />home. However, Government Code Section 66016.5(a)(5)(A) which was added to the Mitigation Fee <br />Act by AB 602 in 2021 contains the following requirement: <br />“A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately <br />to the square footage of proposed units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the <br />square footage of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a <br />reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development” <br />But that requirement is not absolute. Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) provides that a nexus study is not <br />required to comply with Section 66016.5(a)(5)(A) if the local agency makes a finding that includes all <br />of the following: <br />1. An explanation as to why square footage is not the appropriate metric to calculate fees <br />imposed on a housing development project. <br />2. An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship <br />between the fee charged and the burden imposed by the development. <br />3. That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure <br />that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees <br />The proportionality requirement in Section 66016.5(a)(5)(A) is commonly interpreted to mean that <br />impact fees must have a linear relationship to unit square footage. That means the fees must <br />increase by the same amount for every added square foot of unit size. Such a fee structure results <br />in impact fees that are necessarily five times as high for a 3,000 square-foot single-family unit as for <br />Chapter 2. Development Data